Compare ActiveBatch Workload Automation vs. HelpSystems GoAnywhere MFT

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch Workload Automation vs. HelpSystems GoAnywhere MFT and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
446,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"One of the most valuable features is the job templates. If we need to create an FTP job, we just drag over the FTP template and fill out the requirements using the variables that ActiveBatch uses. And that makes it reusable. We can create a job once but use it for many different clients.""The nice thing about ActiveBatch is once we have created a specific job that can be easily be replicated to another job, then minimal changes will have to be made. This makes things nice. Reduction of coding is substantial in a lot of cases. The replication of one job to another is just doing a few minor tweaks and rolling it into production. This decreases our development costs substantially.""One of the valuable features is the ability to trigger workflows, one after another, based on success, without having to worry about overlapping workflows. The ability to integrate our BI, analytics, and our data quality jobs is also valuable""What ActiveBatch allows you to do is develop a more efficient process. It gave me visibility into all my jobs so I could choose which jobs to run in parallel. This is much easier than when I have to try to do it through cron for Windows XP, where you really can't do things in parallel and know what is going on.""We use the main job-scheduling feature. It's the only thing we use in the tool. That's the reason we are using the tool: to reduce costs by replacing manual tasks with automated tasks and to perform regular, repetitive tasks in a more reliable way.""As far as centralization goes it's nice because we can see all these processes that are tied to this larger process. The commissions, FTP processing, the reporting, the file moves to the business users — all that is right there. It's very easy to read. It's easy to tie it together, visually, and see where each of these steps fits into the bigger picture.""The Jobs Library has been a tremendous asset. For the most, that's what we use. There are some outliers, but we pretty much integrate those Jobs Library steps throughout the process, whether it's REST calls, FTP processes, or file copies and moves... That has helped us to build end-to-end workflows.""From a scheduling point of view, it is pretty good."

More ActiveBatch Workload Automation Pros »

"The use of this product has helped improve our organization and its ability to send or receive. It has done this by allowing us to remove any homegrown process and centralize needed actions.""The most valuable feature is the Advanced Workflows.""This is a very good product for managing file transfers."

More HelpSystems GoAnywhere MFT Pros »

Cons
"It does have a little bit of a learning curve because it is fairly complex. You have to learn how it does things. I don't know if it's any worse than any other tool would be, just because of the nature of what it does... the learning curve is the hardest part.""There is this back and forth, where ActiveBatch says, "Your Oracle people should be dealing with this," and Oracle people say, "No, we don't know anything about ActiveBatch." Then, it all falls back on me as to what happens. Nobody is taking responsibility. This is the biggest failing for ActiveBatch.""The thing I've noticed the most is the Help function. It's very difficult, at times, to find examples of how to do something. The Help function will explain what the tool does, but we're not a Windows shop at the data warehouse. Our data warehouse jobs actually run on Linux servers. Finding things for Linux-based solutions is not as easy as it is for Windows-based solutions. I would like to see more examples, and more non-Windows examples as well, in the Help.""I can't get the cleaning up of logs to work consistently. Right now, we are not setup correctly, and maybe it is something that I have not effectively communicated to them.""It could be easier to provide dashboards on how many jobs are running at the same time; more monitoring.""One thing I've noticed is that navigation can be difficult unless you are familiar with the structure that we have in place. If someone else had to look at our ActiveBatch console and find a job, they might not know where to find it.""The interface is not that user-friendly and is a little tough to navigate."

More ActiveBatch Workload Automation Cons »

"Improvement in support or product relies on being ingenious, supportive, and listening to its customer base.""If the hostname has a dash in it then it does not work.""The product could be improved by being modular. There are more features in the core product than any client needs."

More HelpSystems GoAnywhere MFT Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking.""I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market.""It allows for lower operational overhead.""Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

More ActiveBatch Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Licensing can be expensive and it depends upon which features you want to buy.""Pricing is based on a one-time license.""It would be good for the company to explore a modular approach to selling the product so it could be cheaper and more attractive to users."

More HelpSystems GoAnywhere MFT Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer solutions are best for your needs.
446,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: We use the main job-scheduling feature. It's the only thing we use in the tool. That's the reason we are using the tool: to reduce costs by replacing manual tasks with automated tasks and to perform… more »
Top Answer: The cost is outside the scope of my job responsibilities. Obviously we're using it, so it was worth the cost. I think it's a tremendous product. I don't know what the cost is compared to others, but… more »
Top Answer: It could be easier to provide dashboards on how many jobs are running at the same time; more monitoring.
Top Answer: The use of this product has helped improve our organization and its ability to send or receive. It has done this by allowing us to remove any homegrown process and centralize needed actions.
Top Answer: In using this product, I have not found many areas of the product or service that need to be completely improved. However, with any product, improvement of a service or product can always be reviewed… more »
Top Answer: This is used in a virtual environment where a number of customers establish a requirement to send or receive files. The files are sent using SFTP and Zip with projects providing details to customers… more »
Ranking
2nd
Views
1,961
Comparisons
940
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
1,872
Avg. Rating
9.1
5th
Views
1,592
Comparisons
1,210
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
636
Avg. Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
ActiveBatchGoAnywhere MFT, GoAnywhere Managed File Transfer
Learn
Advanced Systems Concepts
HelpSystems
Overview

Orchestrate your entire tech stack with ActiveBatch Workload Automation and Enterprise Job Scheduling. Build and centralize end-to-end workflows under a single pane of glass. Seamlessly manage systems, applications, and services across your organization. Eliminate manual workflows with ActiveBatch so you can focus on higher value activities that drive your company forward.

Limitless Endpoints: Use native integrations and our low-code REST API adapter to connect to any server, any application, any service.

Proactive Support Model: 24/7- US-based support and predictive diagnostics.

Low Code Drag-and-Drop GUI: Easily build reliable, customizable, end-to-end processes.

GoAnywhere MFT is an award-winning managed file transfer software which streamlines, secures, and automates critical file transfers through a centralized enterprise-level solution. The software allows organizations to connect to internal and external systems and exchange encrypted data using industry-standard protocols (e.g. OpenPGP, AES, FTPS, SFTP, HTTPS, AS2, and GPG).

This solution can save you time & money, improve security, and help meet compliance requirements.

Key Features: 

 - Browser-to-browser or sever-to-server file transfer and encryption 

 - Security features to help meet HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOX, GDPR, and other compliance requirements

- Cloud integration and hosted deployments

 - EDI X12 and EDIFACT file translation 

- Secure file sharing, email, and collaboration 

Offer
Learn more about ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Learn more about HelpSystems GoAnywhere MFT
Sample Customers
Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's HospitalMcKesson City of Modesto, California Kwik Trip Northwestern University Charter Communications
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Insurance Company38%
Leisure / Travel Company13%
Pharma/Biotech Company13%
Renewables & Environment Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Insurance Company11%
University8%
Financial Services Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company51%
Comms Service Provider11%
Insurance Company6%
Media Company4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise56%
REVIEWERS
Small Business63%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise25%
Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch Workload Automation vs. HelpSystems GoAnywhere MFT and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
446,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ActiveBatch Workload Automation is ranked 2nd in Managed File Transfer with 7 reviews while HelpSystems GoAnywhere MFT is ranked 5th in Managed File Transfer with 3 reviews. ActiveBatch Workload Automation is rated 9.2, while HelpSystems GoAnywhere MFT is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of ActiveBatch Workload Automation writes "Provides critical functionality in moving from our mainframe to a distributed environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HelpSystems GoAnywhere MFT writes "Easy to use, saves us time, has built-in compression and encryption, and the technical support is good". ActiveBatch Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, Automic Workload Automation, AutoSys Workload Automation, Stonebranch Universal Automation Center and Tidal Automation, whereas HelpSystems GoAnywhere MFT is most compared with BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer, Globalscape GlobalSCAPE Managed File Transfer, MOVEit, IBM Sterling File Gateway and Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct. See our ActiveBatch Workload Automation vs. HelpSystems GoAnywhere MFT report.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.