Compare ActiveBatch Workload Automation vs. WS_FTP Server

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use WS_FTP Server? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, Advanced Systems Concepts, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer. Updated: October 2020.
447,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking.""I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market.""It allows for lower operational overhead.""Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

More ActiveBatch Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer solutions are best for your needs.
447,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: We use the main job-scheduling feature. It's the only thing we use in the tool. That's the reason we are using the tool: to reduce costs by replacing manual tasks with automated tasks and to perform… more »
Top Answer: The cost is outside the scope of my job responsibilities. Obviously we're using it, so it was worth the cost. I think it's a tremendous product. I don't know what the cost is compared to others, but… more »
Top Answer: It could be easier to provide dashboards on how many jobs are running at the same time; more monitoring.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
2nd
Views
1,961
Comparisons
940
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
1,872
Avg. Rating
9.1
22nd
Views
188
Comparisons
147
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 73% of the time.
Also Known As
ActiveBatch
Learn
Advanced Systems Concepts
Progress Software
Overview

Orchestrate your entire tech stack with ActiveBatch Workload Automation and Enterprise Job Scheduling. Build and centralize end-to-end workflows under a single pane of glass. Seamlessly manage systems, applications, and services across your organization. Eliminate manual workflows with ActiveBatch so you can focus on higher value activities that drive your company forward.

Limitless Endpoints: Use native integrations and our low-code REST API adapter to connect to any server, any application, any service.

Proactive Support Model: 24/7- US-based support and predictive diagnostics.

Low Code Drag-and-Drop GUI: Easily build reliable, customizable, end-to-end processes.

WS_FTP Server is a proven, effective, easy-to-use file transfer solution. Secure data in transit while integrating programmable methodologies that simplify file transfer tasks and improve efficiency. Improve control, visibility and security over file transfer activities by implementing safeguards against information leaks and data breaches.

Offer
Learn more about ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Learn more about WS_FTP Server
Sample Customers
Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's HospitalBraunAbility, H&M Software, Killeen School, Positive Images UK, Scientific American, Sciforma, The Denver Broncos
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Insurance Company50%
Leisure / Travel Company13%
Pharma/Biotech Company13%
Renewables & Environment Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Insurance Company11%
University7%
Financial Services Firm6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise44%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, Advanced Systems Concepts, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer. Updated: October 2020.
447,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ActiveBatch Workload Automation is ranked 2nd in Managed File Transfer with 7 reviews while WS_FTP Server is ranked 22nd in Managed File Transfer. ActiveBatch Workload Automation is rated 9.2, while WS_FTP Server is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of ActiveBatch Workload Automation writes "Provides critical functionality in moving from our mainframe to a distributed environment". On the other hand, ActiveBatch Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, Automic Workload Automation, AutoSys Workload Automation, Stonebranch Universal Automation Center and Tidal Automation, whereas WS_FTP Server is most compared with MOVEit and Globalscape GlobalSCAPE Managed File Transfer.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.