ActiveMQ vs. Aurea CX Messenger

As of March 2019, ActiveMQ is ranked 4th in Message Queue with 7 reviews vs Aurea CX Messenger which is ranked 5th in Message Queue with 3 reviews. The top reviewer of ActiveMQ writes "I appreciate the queue, durable topic, and selector features. I would like to see a forked solution of AMQ with AMQP". The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes". ActiveMQ is most compared with RabbitMQ, IBM MQ and Apache Kafka. Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with ActiveMQ, Mule ESB and IBM MQ. See our ActiveMQ vs. Aurea CX Messenger report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ActiveMQ Logo
25,825 views|22,010 comparisons
Aurea CX Messenger Logo
4,482 views|1,924 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveMQ vs. Aurea CX Messenger and other solutions. Updated: March 2019.
325,652 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most important feature is that it's best for JVM-related languages and JMS integration.Reliable message delivery and mirroring.It’s a JMS broker, so the fact that it can allow for asynchronous communication is valuable.Message broadcasting: There could be a use case sending the same message to all consumers. So as a producer, I broadcast the message to a topic. Then, whichever consumers are subscribed to the topic can consume the same message.I appreciate many features including queue, topic, durable topic, and selectors. I also value a different support for different protocols such as MQTT and AMQP. It has full support for EIP, REST, Message Groups, UDP, and TCP.

Read more »

SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required.ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all.

Read more »

Cons
Message Management: Better management of the messages. Perhaps persist them, or put in another queue with another life cycle.It does not scale out well. It ends up being very complex if you have a lot of mirror queues.The clustering for sure needs improvement. When we were using it, the only thing available was an active/passive relationship that had to be maintained via shared file storage. That model includes a single point of failure in that storage medium.Distributed message processing would be a nice addition.Needs to focus on a certain facet and be good at it, instead of handling support for most of the available message brokers.

Read more »

It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc.You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
I think the software is free.It’s open source, ergo free.I use open source with standard Apache licensing.

Read more »

You pay nothing for licensing, because the commercial model is a subscription. Other environments, such as QA and Development, are included in the subscriptionMuch better than Oracle SOA Suite.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue solutions are best for your needs.
325,652 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
out of 13 in Message Queue
Views
25,825
Comparisons
22,010
Reviews
7
Followers
597
Avg. Rating
8.0
5th
out of 13 in Message Queue
Views
4,482
Comparisons
1,924
Reviews
3
Followers
187
Avg. Rating
9.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 49% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
AMQCX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ
Learn
Apache
Aurea
Overview

Apache ActiveMQ is the most popular and powerful open source messaging and Integration Patterns server.

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

Offer
Learn more about ActiveMQ
Learn more about Aurea CX Messenger
Sample Customers
University of Washington, Daugherty Systems, CSC, STG Technologies, Inc. Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm29%
Insurance Company19%
Mining And Metals Company12%
Transportation Company8%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise62%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise84%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveMQ vs. Aurea CX Messenger and other solutions. Updated: March 2019.
325,652 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Message Queue reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email