We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare ActiveMQ vs. Aurea CX Messenger

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ActiveMQ Logo
15,302 views|12,412 comparisons
Aurea CX Messenger Logo
908 views|514 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"I'm impressed, I think that Active MQ is great."

More ActiveMQ Pros »

"The solution offers excellent stability."

More Aurea CX Messenger Pros »

Cons
"This solution could improve by providing better documentation."

More ActiveMQ Cons »

"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."

More Aurea CX Messenger Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
15,302
Comparisons
12,412
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
522
Rating
7.0
Views
908
Comparisons
514
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
495
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
AMQ
CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ
Learn More
Aurea
Video Not Available
Overview

Apache ActiveMQ is the most popular and powerful open source messaging and Integration Patterns server.

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

Offer
Learn more about ActiveMQ
Learn more about Aurea CX Messenger
Sample Customers
University of Washington, Daugherty Systems, CSC, STG Technologies, Inc. 
Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm43%
Transportation Company29%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
Computer Software Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm14%
Government5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider15%
Manufacturing Company9%
Retailer5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise64%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, Solace and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: November 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.

ActiveMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review while Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 11th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review. ActiveMQ is rated 7.0, while Aurea CX Messenger is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ActiveMQ writes "Stable with a straightforward setup, but better documentation is needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Excellent stability, capable of scaling, and good at supporting security particulars". ActiveMQ is most compared with Apache Kafka, IBM MQ, VMware RabbitMQ and Anypoint MQ, whereas Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with IBM MQ, Mule ESB, Apache Kafka, VMware RabbitMQ and TIBCO Enterprise Message Service.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.