• Home
  • ActiveMQ vs. Oracle Tuxedo Message Queue [EOL]

ActiveMQ vs Oracle Tuxedo Message Queue [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo

ActiveMQ

Read 24 ActiveMQ reviews
12,217 views|6,891 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo

Oracle Tuxedo Message Queue [EOL]

views| comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Message Queue (MQ) Software
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ActiveMQ and Oracle Tuxedo Message Queue [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Message Queue (MQ) Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
George Thomas
High performance, good message toll replication, and the ability to raise network processes
We do not use this product extensively. It is primarily used as part of our application deployment and message structuring. We haven't used the... Read more →
Use Oracle Tuxedo Message Queue [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I use open source with standard Apache licensing."
  • "It’s open source, ergo free."
  • "I think the software is free."
  • "We are using the open-source version, so we have not looked at any pricing."
  • "There are no fees because it is open-source."
  • "We use the open-source version."
  • "ActiveMQ is open source, so it is free to use."
  • "The tool's pricing is reasonable and competitive compared to other solutions."

    • More ActiveMQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about ActiveMQ?
    Top Answer:For reliable messaging, the most valuable feature of ActiveMQ for us is ensuring prompt message delivery.
    Read all 10 answers   →
    What needs improvement with ActiveMQ?
    Top Answer:In terms of improvement, one potential area would be the complexity of the initial setup. It is not overly complex, but it could pose challenges for first-time users.
    Read all 10 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for ActiveMQ?
    Top Answer:We use ActiveMQ for message brokering in our architecture. It is a central hub where we publish codes like city codes and office IDs for our server application. Other applications subscribe to… more »
    Read all 7 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 21 in Message Queue (MQ) Software
    Views
    12,217
    Comparisons
    6,891
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    385
    Rating
    7.6
    Unranked
    In Message Queue (MQ) Software
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AMQ
    Oracle TuxedoMQ, TuxedoMQ
    Learn More
    Apache
    Oracle
    Overview

    Apache ActiveMQ is the most popular and powerful open source messaging and Integration Patterns server.

    Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License

    • A proven solution for mission-critical messaging across heterogeneous environments
    • Enables applications in different locations and on different platforms to exchange messages asynchronously whether in batch, real time, or a mix
    • Enables applications to move easily among systems from different vendors, as well as homegrown applications
    • Path forward for Oracle MessageQ customers with tools for efficient upgrade
    • An alternative to IBM MQ with out of the box integration for Tuxedo applications
    Sample Customers
    University of Washington, Daugherty Systems, CSC, STG Technologies, Inc. 
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm42%
    Transportation Company17%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Computer Software Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise77%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Message Queue (MQ) Software
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ActiveMQ is ranked 3rd in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 24 reviews while Oracle Tuxedo Message Queue [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Message Queue (MQ) Software. ActiveMQ is rated 7.8, while Oracle Tuxedo Message Queue [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of ActiveMQ writes "Allows for asynchronous communication, enabling services to operate independently but issues with stability". On the other hand, ActiveMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, Anypoint MQ, Red Hat AMQ, VMware RabbitMQ and Apache Kafka, whereas Oracle Tuxedo Message Queue [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.