ActivIdentity 4TRESS [EOL] vs CA Risk Authentication [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ActivIdentity 4TRESS [EOL] and CA Risk Authentication [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Authentication Systems
Unranked
In Authentication Systems
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
4TRESS
CA RiskMinder
Learn More
HID
Video Not Available
Overview
AAA solution that provides physical and logical access coordination, internal threats protection for secure remote access.

CA Risk Authentication is a powerful risk-based, adaptive authentication solution that works in real time to evaluate context, calculate a risk score, recommend actions and provide alerts/case management. It has a strong set of prebuilt rules to detect risk and an easy-to-use risk management console to adjust parameters or create new rules. The risk engine examines many factors including device identification, geolocation, IP address and user activity to evaluate risk. The calculated risk score is then fed into your policies to decide whether to authorize the current activity, request step-up authentication and/or send an alert or block the activity. This provides your organization with a transparent layer of protection against identity theft, data breaches and fraud. CA Risk Authentication can be used to reduce fraud and protect users from Internet attacks whether they are shopping online or accessing confidential or private information via a Web portal or application. It also provides organizations the ability to enforce different levels of authentication depending on the user activity, transaction value and the calculated risk score.

Sample Customers
Bodega Norton, Carlsberg and Kegspertise Keg, University of Reykjavik, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Alticor,Costa Rica Foreign Resident DIMEX Card, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Global bank based in the United States
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

ActivIdentity 4TRESS [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems while CA Risk Authentication [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems. ActivIdentity 4TRESS [EOL] is rated 0.0, while CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of CA Risk Authentication [EOL] writes "If we spot anomalies we can step up authentication. The policy entrance should learn from that state rather than reverting back to what it believes is the static good". ActivIdentity 4TRESS [EOL] is most compared with , whereas CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.