We performed a comparison between Acumatica and SAP S/4HANA Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution supports multiple branches."
"The way everything integrated well with everything else was most valuable. We had one solution for everything, from the first phone call down to follow-up visits for wholesale callers and for just regular purchases."
"The solution is stable."
"The reporting that we are doing from SAP S/4HANA Cloud is a valuable feature."
"The manufacturing area is a good feature."
"It is a straightforward solution."
"Since SAP S/4HANA Cloud is a SaaS application, it is already providing a lot of standard out-of-the-box features."
"Makes it easier to reach and read data."
"The guidance SAP offers for implementing the product is clear and the online resources are great."
"Managing the server and taking advantage of the services provided by SAP itself is the most valuable feature."
"For support, we go through a distributor, and the support we receive from them is much better than what we would from Acumatica directly. When we went to Acumatica support directly, we were not happy with it."
"The solution doesn't have features to break down the structure for multiple people in the project."
"We should be able to personalize it for the company. There should be more customization of the pages so that they seem more like a company rather than as an outside company. We should be able to change company images and things like that and do this kind of personalization."
"The scalability of SAP S/4HANNA is an area that could be improved."
"The product can be improved by including a module for after-sales service modules."
"Integrating SAP with other products like payroll solutions should be smoother. I wish there were some tools a consultant could build according to the client's requirements. For example, say I want to process debit and credits. In SAP, we have to follow SAP terminologies and patterns. I need a template to deploy my structure according to the client's requirements. There is no structure available in SAP that a consultant can mold."
"The user experience has some room for improvement. S/4HANA covers various scenarios based on the best business practices, but users complain about its user experience. It is not a user-friendly ERP solution. I rate the current UX seven out of 10."
"The initial setup can be complex, depending on the environment."
"The implementation time for S/4HANA Cloud could be reduced."
"The only thing I would improve is the overall user experience, particularly the mobile app. S/4HANA is a powerful, scalable platform, but the user experience isn't positive. It's a bit complex. The look and feel aren't attractive, and the mobile experience isn't great."
"The user interface of SAP S/4HANA Cloud needs to be improved because it is not as good as other applications."
Acumatica is ranked 6th in Cloud ERP with 3 reviews while SAP S/4HANA Cloud is ranked 3rd in Cloud ERP with 41 reviews. Acumatica is rated 8.0, while SAP S/4HANA Cloud is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Acumatica writes "Provided one solution for everything and housed everything for us". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA Cloud writes "A valuable tool for businesses seeking to enhance their overall performance and competitiveness in the digital era". Acumatica is most compared with NetSuite ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, HubSpot CRM, Microsoft Dynamics CRM and Pipedrive, whereas SAP S/4HANA Cloud is most compared with SAP Business ByDesign, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, IFS Cloud Platform and PeopleSoft. See our Acumatica vs. SAP S/4HANA Cloud report.
See our list of best Cloud ERP vendors.
We monitor all Cloud ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.