Compare Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner vs. ImmuniWeb

Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner is ranked 8th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 8 reviews while ImmuniWeb is ranked 27th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 1 review. Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner is rated 7.2, while ImmuniWeb is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner writes "Interactive Application Security Testing provides more in-depth, granular findings, but integration with other tools is very limited". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ImmuniWeb writes "Increases network visibility and vulnerability awareness with zero false positives". Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner is most compared with OWASP Zap, Checkmarx and Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner, whereas ImmuniWeb is most compared with Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner, Qualys Web Application Scanning and NowSecure.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, Micro Focus and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: January 2020.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Our developers can run the attacks directly from their environments, desktops.The vulnerability scanning option for analyzing the security loopholes on the websites is the most valuable feature of this solution.The automated approach to these repetitive discovery attempts would take days to do manually and therefore it helps reduce the time needed to do an assessment.Their technical support has been very active. If I have an issue, I can reach out to them and get an answer pretty quick.We are able to create a report which shows the PCI DSS scoring and share it with the application teams. Then, they can correlate and see exactly what they need to fix, and why.One of the features that I feel is groundbreaking, that I would like to see expanded on, is the IAS feature: The Interactive Application Security Testing module that gets loaded onto an application on a server, for more in-depth, granular findings. I think that is really neat. I haven't seen a lot of competitors doing that.The most important feature is that it's a web-based graphical user interface. That is a great addition. Also, the ability to schedule scans is great.

Read more »

The most valuable features are the SLA of Zero false-positives, less time of service development, validation of unlimited patched vulnerabilities, and several others.

Read more »

Cons
Tools that would allow us to work more efficiently with the mobile environment, with Android and iOS.In terms of what needs improvement, the way the licensing model is currently is not very convenient for us because initially, when we bought it, the licensing model was very flexible, but now it restricts us.It would be nice to have a feature to "retest" only a single vulnerability that the customer reports as patched, and delete it from the next scans since it has already been patched.You can't actually change your password after you've set it unless you go back into the administration account and you change it there. Thus, if you're locked out and don't remember your password, that's a thing.We have had issues during upgrades where their scans worked on some apps better with previous versions. Then, we had to work with their tech support, who were great, to get it fixed for the next version.Integration into other tools is very limited for Acunetix. While we're trying to incorporate a CI/CD process where we're integrating with JIRA and we're integrating with Jenkins and Chef, it becomes problematic. Other tools give you a high integration capability to connect into different solutions that you may already have, like JIRA.It should be easier to recreate something manually, with the manual tool, because Acunetix is an automatic tool. If it finds something, it should be easier to manually replicate it. Sometimes you don't get the raw data from the input and output, so that could be improved.

Read more »

A great idea would be to support using Discovery on the internal network, allowing delivery of all the features of the current Discovery to internal network resources.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000.All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio.The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable.When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted.Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special.

Read more »

The values of ImmuniWeb are currently significantly below what is valued in the Chilean market for these services and solutions.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
6,627
Comparisons
4,900
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
1,011
Avg. Rating
7.3
Views
757
Comparisons
530
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 17% of the time.
Also Known As
AcuSensor
Learn
Acunetix
High-Tech Bridge
Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

ImmuniWeb® provides AI-enabled Application Security Testing and Attack Surface Management SaaS solutions for web, mobile and IoT security testing, digital asset inventory with actionable security ratings, and Dark Web monitoring tailored to reduce complexity and operational costs.

ImmuniWeb, headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, is a spin-off from an award-winning MSSP provider High-Tech Bridge SA fully dedicated to ImmuniWeb® AI Platform. ImmuniWeb also has a branch office in Austin, Texas.

ImmuniWeb® Awards

ImmuniWeb® is featured on Gartner Peer Insights. Read verified reviews of ImmuniWeb® from Gartner customers.

ImmuniWeb® received the Elite “Hall of Fame” status in SC Media’s Reboot 19 Innovator Award.

ImmuniWeb® AI Platform is the Winner in “Best usage of Machine Learning / AI” category at SC Awards Europe 2018.

Gartner names High-Tech Bridge a "Cool Vendor" in "Security for Midsize Enterprise 2017" research.

ImmuniWeb® AI Products

ImmuniWeb® AI Platform offers four award-winning application security products that can be used separately or jointly, to meet any web or mobile application security testing needs in compliance with laws and regulations, such as GDPR, PCI DSS, NIST, HIPAA.

ImmuniWeb® Discovery

ImmuniWeb® Discovery reduces the complexity and costs of cybersecurity and compliance with the continuous discovery of your external digital assets and attack surface. Attack Surface Management (ASM) is enhanced with actionable Security Ratings for your assets and proactive Dark Web monitoring.

To find out more about ImmuniWeb® visit https://www.immuniweb.com.

Offer
Learn more about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner
Learn more about ImmuniWeb
Sample Customers
Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New ZealandEbay, United Nations, Next Bank Credit Agricole, Geneva Swiss Bank, Banca Stato, Celgene, SIM University, Heymarket, Swissquote, more...
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company18%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government13%
Media Company10%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, Micro Focus and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: January 2020.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.