Compare Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
501,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"We are using the Veracode tools to expose the engineers to the security vulnerabilities that were introduced with the new features, i.e. a lot faster or sooner in the development life cycle.""The most valuable feature comes from the fact that it is cloud-based, and I can scale up without having to worry about any other infrastructure needs.""I have used this solution in multiple projects for vulnerability testing and finding security leaks within the code.""We used it for performing security checks. We have many Java applications and Android applications. Essentially it was used for checking the security validations for compliance purposes.""Veracode is a valuable tool in our secure SDLC process.""Integrations into our developer's IDE (Greenlight) and the DevOps Pipeline SAST / SourceClear Integrations has particularly increased our time to market and confidence.""The source composition analysis component is great because it gives our developers some comfort in using new libraries.""Veracode's cloud-based approach, coupled with the appliance that lets us use Veracode to scan internal-only web applications, has provided a seamless, always-up-to-date application security scanning solution."

More Veracode Pros »

"The automated approach to these repetitive discovery attempts would take days to do manually and therefore it helps reduce the time needed to do an assessment.""The vulnerability scanning option for analyzing the security loopholes on the websites is the most valuable feature of this solution.""Our developers can run the attacks directly from their environments, desktops.""It can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated with other applications, which makes it a very versatile solution to have.""For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature.""The scalability is good. The scalability is more than good because it can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated as part of applications. So that really makes it a very, very versatile solution to have.""Picks up weaknesses in our app setups.""The usability and overall scan results are good."

More Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner Pros »

"This tool is more accurate than the other solutions that we use, and reports fewer false positives.""This solution has helped a lot in finding bugs and vulnerabilities, and the scanner is good enough for simple web apps.""Some of the extensions, available using Burp Extender, are also very good and we have found issues by using them.""The Spider is the most useful feature. It helps to analyze the entire web application, and it finds all the passes and offers an automated identification of security issues.""BurpSuite helps us to identify and fix silly mistakes that are sometimes introduced by our developers in their coding.""Once I capture the proxy, I'm able to transfer across. All the requested information is there. I can send across the request to what we call a repeater, where I get to ready the payload that I send to the application. Put in malicious content and then see if it's responding to it.""The suite testing models are very good. It's very secure.""The way they do the research and they keep their profile up to date is great. They identify vulnerabilities and update them immediately."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Pros »

Cons
"Veracode should make it easier to navigate between the solutions that they offer, i.e. between dynamic, static, and the source code analysis.""I would like to see expanded coverage for supporting more platforms, frameworks, and languages.""Ideally, I would like better reporting that gives me a more concise and accurate description of what my pain points are, and how to get to them.""One of the things that we have from a reporting point of view, is that we would love to see a graphical report. If you look through a report for something that has come back from Veracode, it takes a whole lot of time to just go through all the pages of the code to figure out exactly what it says. We know certain areas don’t have the greatest security features but those are usually minor and we don’t want to see those types of notifications.""It needs better controls to include/exclude specific sections when creating a report that can be shared externally with customers and prospects.""Improve Mobile Application Dynamic Scanning DAST - .ipa and .apk""I think for us the biggest improvement would be to have an indicator when there's something wrong with a scan.""One feature I would like would be more selectivity in email alerts. While I like getting these, I would like to be able to be more granular in which ones I receive."

More Veracode Cons »

"It would be nice to have a feature to "retest" only a single vulnerability that the customer reports as patched, and delete it from the next scans since it has already been patched.""In terms of what needs improvement, the way the licensing model is currently is not very convenient for us because initially, when we bought it, the licensing model was very flexible, but now it restricts us.""Tools that would allow us to work more efficiently with the mobile environment, with Android and iOS.""When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic.""The solution limits the number of scans. It would be much better if we could have unlimited scans.""We want to see how much bandwidth usage it consumes. When we monitor traffic we have issues with the consumption and throttling of the traffic.""Currently only supports web scanning.""There is room for improvement in website authentication because I've seen other products that can do it much better."

More Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner Cons »

"There is a lot to this product, and it would be good if when you purchase the tool, they can provide us with a more extensive user manual.""The scanner and crawler need to be improved.""I would like to see a more optimized solution, as it currently uses a lot of CPU power and memory.""The number of false positives need to be reduced on the solution.""The Auto Scanning features should be updated more frequently and should include the latest attack vectors.""The biggest improvement that I would like to see from PortSwigger that today many people see as an issue in their testing. There might be a feature which might be desired.""The solution doesn't offer very good scalability.""The biggest drawback is reporting. It's not so good. I can download them, but they're not so informative."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.""They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.""For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing.""If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount.""Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive.""We use this product per project rather than per developer... Your development model will really determine what the best fit is for you in terms of licensing, because of the project-based licensing. If you do a few projects, that's more attractive. If you have a large number of developers, that would also make the product a little more attractive."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio.""The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000.""I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced.""The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based.""When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay.""Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

More Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The cost is approximately $500 for a single license, and there are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees.""Our licensing cost is approximately $400 USD per year.""The yearly cost is about $300.""There is no setup cost and the cost of licensing is affordable.""Licensing costs are about $450/year for one use. For larger organizations, they're able to test against multiple applications while simultaneously others might have multiple versions of applications which needs to be tested which is why we have the enterprise edition.""There are different licenses available that include a free version.""At $400 or $500 per license paid annually, it is a very cheap tool.""PortSwigger is reasonably-priced. It's fair."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs.
501,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It's comprehensive from a feature standpoint.
Top Answer: I would recommend them. They have the ability to cover multiple languages and come with all the features you would… more »
Top Answer: SonarQube depends on completely what you configure the Rules. You will have the option of the Profile creation and can… more »
Top Answer: Acunetix has an awesome crawler. It gives a referral site map of near targets and also goes really deep to find all the… more »
Top Answer: I think all the scanners, except Burp Suite, are a bit costly. Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business… more »
Top Answer: I had some issues with the JSON parameters where it found some strange vulnerabilities, but it didn't alert the person… more »
Top Answer: Yes OWASP ZAP is a good option as it's an open source so always preferred but Burp Suite Pro  will give you more… more »
Top Answer: I have found the best features to be the performance and there are a lot of additional plugins available.
Top Answer: The price for the solution is expensive and could be cheaper. We pay an annual license and our team has several of them.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
AcuSensor
Burp
Learn More
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

Offer
Learn more about Veracode
Learn more about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner
Learn more about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, Rekner
Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand
Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Insurance Company10%
Computer Software Company10%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm10%
Manufacturing Company6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm42%
Comms Service Provider17%
Non Tech Company8%
Computer Software Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm6%
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company42%
Financial Services Firm33%
Insurance Company8%
University8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider25%
Media Company6%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise51%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise49%
REVIEWERS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise47%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise66%
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise59%
Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
501,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner is ranked 11th in Application Security with 12 reviews while PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is ranked 6th in Application Security with 22 reviews. Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner is rated 7.2, while PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner writes "We are getting notably fewer false positives than previously, but reporting output needs to be simplified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional writes "Great design, excellent features like Intruder, Repeater, Decoder with plenty of plug-ins from community forums". Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner is most compared with OWASP Zap, Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner, Fortify WebInspect, Rapid7 AppSpider and Qualys Web Application Scanning, whereas PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is most compared with OWASP Zap, Fortify WebInspect, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, Qualys Web Application Scanning and HCL AppScan. See our Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Application Security vendors and best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.