• Home
  • Acunetix vs. SourceClear [EOL]

Acunetix vs SourceClear [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Invicti Logo

Acunetix

Read 26 Acunetix reviews
5,695 views|4,292 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Veracode Logo

SourceClear [EOL]

views| comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Testing (AST)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Acunetix and SourceClear [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
SivaPrakash
Fantastic reporting features hindered by slow scanning
Use SourceClear [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."
  • "Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."
  • "The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."
  • "All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."
  • "The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."
  • "I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."
  • "The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."
  • "When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

    • More Acunetix Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.
    Read all 25 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Acunetix Vulnerab...
    Top Answer:It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the… more »
    Read all 17 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
    Top Answer:There are some versions of the solution that are not as stable as others.
    Read all 20 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    11th
    out of 67 in Application Security Testing (AST)
    Views
    5,695
    Comparisons
    4,292
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    317
    Rating
    8.6
    Unranked
    In Application Security Testing (AST)
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AcuSensor
    Learn More
    Invicti
    Veracode
    Overview

    Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

    SourceClear provides a way to easily check the open-source libraries being used in your code repositories for vulnerabilities. By utilizing the native build and package managers which manage your open-source libraries, SourceClear is capable of accurately identifying vulnerabilities in your open-source code and additionally providing fix information for vulnerabilities you might have.

    Sample Customers
    Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand
    Zendesk, Medallia, Marchex, GAP, Datastax
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Media Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government9%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise59%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Testing (AST)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Acunetix is ranked 11th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 26 reviews while SourceClear [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Security Testing (AST). Acunetix is rated 7.6, while SourceClear [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Acunetix writes "Fantastic reporting features hindered by slow scanning ". On the other hand, Acunetix is most compared with OWASP Zap, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, HCL AppScan and Fortify WebInspect, whereas SourceClear [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.