Adabas vs FileMaker comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Software AG Logo
108 views|88 comparisons
Apple Logo
211 views|78 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Its price is pretty reasonable. I am at a university. We get educational discount pricing from most of the major vendors."
  • More FileMaker Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    8th
    Views
    108
    Comparisons
    88
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    5th
    Views
    211
    Comparisons
    78
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Database server for large and mission-critical business applications that require sub-second response times.

    Cross-platform relational database application
    Sample Customers
    Public Authority of Civil Information (PACI), Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (EMM), Alliance Healthcare, Florida State College, Smals, Santander Consumer Bank Austria, Apollo-Optik
    VUHL, Reynolds Services Inc., Market Refrigeration Specialists, Sea Breeze Farm, Jordan Lindblad, Henry Schein Dental

    Adabas is ranked 8th in Non-Relational Databases while FileMaker is ranked 5th in Non-Relational Databases. Adabas is rated 0.0, while FileMaker is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of FileMaker writes "User-friendly, very stable, reasonable price, integrates well, and has all sorts of capabilities". Adabas is most compared with IBM IMS and CA IDMS, whereas FileMaker is most compared with FoxPro.

    See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

    We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.