Compare Adabas vs. IBM IMS

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Adabas Logo
148 views|104 comparisons
IBM IMS Logo
457 views|409 comparisons
Ranking
7th
Views
148
Comparisons
104
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
4th
Views
457
Comparisons
409
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 70% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
IMS
Learn
Software AG
IBM
Overview

Database server for large and mission-critical business applications that require sub-second response times.

Off-the-shelf warehouse management solution designed to help automate and streamline facility operations.
Offer
Learn more about Adabas
Learn more about IBM IMS
Sample Customers
Public Authority of Civil Information (PACI), Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (EMM), Alliance Healthcare, Florida State College, Smals, Santander Consumer Bank Austria, Apollo-OptikNice Céte d'Azur, Ultra Petroleum, Hudson River HealthCare, SRG Global, The Poseidon Project, The City of Edinburgh Council, PotashCorp, ANZ, OTTO, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, NASCO, Apria Healthcare, Folksam

Adabas is ranked 7th in Non-Relational Databases while IBM IMS is ranked 4th in Non-Relational Databases. Adabas is rated 0.0, while IBM IMS is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Adabas is most compared with CA IDMS, whereas IBM IMS is most compared with CA IDMS, CA Datacom and Oracle Berkeley DB.

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.