Adabas vs IBM IMS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Software AG Logo
109 views|88 comparisons
IBM Logo
99 views|96 comparisons
Ranking
8th
Views
109
Comparisons
88
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
6th
Views
99
Comparisons
96
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
IMS
Learn More
Overview

Database server for large and mission-critical business applications that require sub-second response times.

Off-the-shelf warehouse management solution designed to help automate and streamline facility operations.
Sample Customers
Public Authority of Civil Information (PACI), Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (EMM), Alliance Healthcare, Florida State College, Smals, Santander Consumer Bank Austria, Apollo-Optik
Nice Céte d'Azur, Ultra Petroleum, Hudson River HealthCare, SRG Global, The Poseidon Project, The City of Edinburgh Council, PotashCorp, ANZ, OTTO, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, NASCO, Apria Healthcare, Folksam
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm19%
Government14%
Manufacturing Company6%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise75%

Adabas is ranked 8th in Non-Relational Databases while IBM IMS is ranked 6th in Non-Relational Databases. Adabas is rated 0.0, while IBM IMS is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Adabas is most compared with CA IDMS, whereas IBM IMS is most compared with CA IDMS.

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.