Compare Adabas vs. InterSystems Caché

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Adabas Logo
151 views|105 comparisons
InterSystems Caché Logo
322 views|179 comparisons
Ranking
7th
Views
151
Comparisons
105
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
6th
Views
322
Comparisons
179
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 61% of the time.
Compared 39% of the time.
Also Known As
InterSystems Cache
Learn
Software AG
InterSystems
Overview

Database server for large and mission-critical business applications that require sub-second response times.

Post-relational database for e-applications; delivers breakthrough performance for highly scalable Web applications.
Offer
Learn more about Adabas
Learn more about InterSystems Caché
Sample Customers
Public Authority of Civil Information (PACI), Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (EMM), Alliance Healthcare, Florida State College, Smals, Santander Consumer Bank Austria, Apollo-OptikCysNET, Paltac Corporation, WS trends, PCS, Eventsforce, Ontario Systems, TD Ameritrade, MFS Investment Management, Assurenet, European Space Agency (ESA)

Adabas is ranked 7th in Non-Relational Databases while InterSystems Caché is ranked 6th in Non-Relational Databases. Adabas is rated 0.0, while InterSystems Caché is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Adabas is most compared with IBM IMS and CA IDMS, whereas InterSystems Caché is most compared with Oracle Database In-Memory.

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.