Adabas vs InterSystems Caché comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Software AG Logo
109 views|88 comparisons
InterSystems Logo
148 views|63 comparisons
Ranking
8th
Views
109
Comparisons
88
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
9th
Views
148
Comparisons
63
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
InterSystems Cache
Learn More
Overview

Database server for large and mission-critical business applications that require sub-second response times.

Post-relational database for e-applications; delivers breakthrough performance for highly scalable Web applications.
Sample Customers
Public Authority of Civil Information (PACI), Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (EMM), Alliance Healthcare, Florida State College, Smals, Santander Consumer Bank Austria, Apollo-Optik
CysNET, Paltac Corporation, WS trends, PCS, Eventsforce, Ontario Systems, TD Ameritrade, MFS Investment Management, Assurenet, European Space Agency (ESA)
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Educational Organization66%
Healthcare Company15%
Computer Software Company6%
Manufacturing Company3%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise65%
Large Enterprise29%

Adabas is ranked 8th in Non-Relational Databases while InterSystems Caché is ranked 9th in Non-Relational Databases. Adabas is rated 0.0, while InterSystems Caché is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Adabas is most compared with IBM IMS and CA IDMS, whereas InterSystems Caché is most compared with .

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.