Compare Adabas vs. InterSystems Caché
Ranking  | |
Views 151 Comparisons 105 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 322 Comparisons 179 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 61% of the time.  Compared 39% of the time. |  Compared 100% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| InterSystems Cache | |
Learn | |
| Software AG | InterSystems |
Overview | |
Database server for large and mission-critical business applications that require sub-second response times. | Post-relational database for e-applications; delivers breakthrough performance for highly scalable Web applications. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Adabas | Learn more about InterSystems Caché |
Sample Customers | |
| Public Authority of Civil Information (PACI), Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (EMM), Alliance Healthcare, Florida State College, Smals, Santander Consumer Bank Austria, Apollo-Optik | CysNET, Paltac Corporation, WS trends, PCS, Eventsforce, Ontario Systems, TD Ameritrade, MFS Investment Management, Assurenet, European Space Agency (ESA) |
Adabas is ranked 7th in Non-Relational Databases while InterSystems Caché is ranked 6th in Non-Relational Databases. Adabas is rated 0.0, while InterSystems Caché is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Adabas is most compared with IBM IMS and CA IDMS, whereas InterSystems Caché is most compared with Oracle Database In-Memory.
See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.
We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.