Compare Adabas vs. TigerLogic XDMS

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Adabas Logo
152 views|109 comparisons
TigerLogic XDMS Logo
27 views|11 comparisons
Ranking
7th
Views
152
Comparisons
109
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
15th
Views
27
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 60% of the time.
Compared 40% of the time.
Learn
Software AG
TigerLogic
Video Not Available
Overview

Database server for large and mission-critical business applications that require sub-second response times.

TigerLogic XDMS is an enterprise native XML database management server with both data- and document-centric capabilities. The TigerLogic XDMS difference comes from its core technology: a data model that is optimal for managing and storing any kind of XML or non-XML data and its extensible XQuery Engine.
Offer
Learn more about Adabas
Learn more about TigerLogic XDMS
Sample Customers
Public Authority of Civil Information (PACI), Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (EMM), Alliance Healthcare, Florida State College, Smals, Santander Consumer Bank Austria, Apollo-OptikArts Management Systems, Future Chalk Software, Tek Service Srl, Just Software bvba, Senex, Am_tiq AG, CNM, WigaSoft AG, 24 ore software, Abraxas Juris AG, TheDataManager, Catalina Software, The Conrad Company, ADJob Nordic AB, J+D Software, Enviro Data, The International Education and Training Corporation, 888 Software Products Srl, Instinct Systems
Adabas is ranked 7th in Non-Relational Databases while TigerLogic XDMS is ranked 15th in Non-Relational Databases. Adabas is rated 0.0, while TigerLogic XDMS is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Adabas is most compared with IBM IMS and CA IDMS, whereas TigerLogic XDMS is most compared with .

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.