We performed a comparison between Adaptavist Test Management for Jira and TestRail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools."It is a scalable solution."
"We don't use technical support. We have an office in Austria that provides us with solutions. Also, this solution is pretty simple and user-friendly. We don't really need help with it."
"You can group test cases together and track the execution of them."
"The program is very stable and scalable."
"The most valuable features of TestRail by Gurock are the user experience, it's very easy to learn. There is no learning curve needed to work on projects and manage the test cases, it is easy. Exporting and importing are simple."
"You don't need to follow complex procedures to create a test run, test case, etc."
"The product helps us create test cases and reports."
"Most valuable features are the ease of organizing test cases and a great API for sending results from automated test run results into the database."
"The product’s most valuable feature is the UI. The structure of test cases is easy to understand."
"I use the solution for test management."
"I was on the lookout for automation testing on the browser and I believe this tool is very interesting in that matter. The solution is useful for UI testing. You just need to add the URL that is to be checked."
"The integration with Jira and the ability for extra configurations are the most valuable features."
"Lacking visual gadgets that go on a dashboard, pie charts, bar charts and histograms."
"They should work on integrating the solution with AI."
"I don't like that you need to use a lot of tabs. One test case takes 15-20 minutes and on Zephyr is take about 5-10 minutes."
"I have faced some issues with the integration between TestRail and Jira, which haven't been permanently resolved yet."
"The test suite management has room for improvement as well as better reporting."
"It would be nice to have a description section when creating the test scenario itself so I can indicate what the configuration should be."
"Their customer support could be improved. Sometimes we struggle with that. It could be faster. Whenever we raise any query, they get back to you but the turnaround time is very slow."
"The platform needs improvement regarding performance and creating links."
"TestRail by Gurock could improve by adding a defect management module tool. It would add a lot of value if I want to install it and I don't have Jira or an isolating team. For example, if I am providing a service it's separated from the development team, it then would be better to have defect management included with the test management. However, as it is now I need to be integrated with Jira or another defect management tool to complete the testing process."
"The product is not focused on synthetic data creation. I would also like to see more integrations with other platforms."
"The TestRail API to integrate reporting of automated tests is complete, but requires many requests to identify the appropriate entry."
More Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Pricing and Cost Advice →
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is ranked 10th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews while TestRail is ranked 3rd in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is rated 7.2, while TestRail is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira writes "Integrates with any automation tool, but the granular reporting feature should be more intuitive ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestRail writes "A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities". Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, Tricentis Tosca, Tricentis qTest, TFS and Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer, whereas TestRail is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, TFS, Tricentis qTest, Sealights and Tricentis Tosca.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.