We performed a comparison between Adaptavist Test Management for Jira and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools."You can group test cases together and track the execution of them."
"The program is very stable and scalable."
"It is a scalable solution."
"We don't use technical support. We have an office in Austria that provides us with solutions. Also, this solution is pretty simple and user-friendly. We don't really need help with it."
"The stability has always been very good."
"The documentation is easy, and it helps us solve our problems."
"Visual Studio is highly powerful. It's probably the best software development tool on the market."
"The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects."
"One of the best documentation in the world."
"It is a good and user-friendly tool."
"Visual Studio is the easiest to use."
"It is a very common and strong product. A lot of support is available for this product."
"I don't like that you need to use a lot of tabs. One test case takes 15-20 minutes and on Zephyr is take about 5-10 minutes."
"Lacking visual gadgets that go on a dashboard, pie charts, bar charts and histograms."
"They should work on integrating the solution with AI."
"The price is reasonable, but it's not the best."
"Sometimes Visual Studio is slow. It uses a lot of resources like memory and processing power. You should optimize the performance by only installing what you need on your machine. Don't install unnecessary things that will slow your machine."
"The solution can improve the startup time."
"The solution's documentation could be improved because it keeps disappearing from the solution."
"The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use."
"The product must provide more integration."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
"Enhancing the support for web application testing and load performance would be an improvement."
More Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is ranked 10th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 5th in Test Management Tools with 46 reviews. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is rated 7.2, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira writes "Integrates with any automation tool, but the granular reporting feature should be more intuitive ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, Tricentis Tosca, Tricentis qTest, TFS and Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.