Adaptive Enterprise Architecture Manager vs Ardoq comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ardoq Logo
1,198 views|937 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adaptive Enterprise Architecture Manager and Ardoq based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Architecture Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Adaptive Enterprise Architecture Manager?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "We pay for extended support."
  • More Ardoq Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Hi @Cheryl Joseph ​Looking at the crossover between Project and Portfolio management with EA, then Planview could be a good choice. If looking at Portfolio Management from an EA perspective then… more »
    Top Answer:Here is a comparison of Ardoq and Sparx Systems, two popular Enterprise Architecture Management (EAM) tools Ardoq Pros: o Ardoq has a user-friendly interface that makes it easy to create and… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    59
    Comparisons
    37
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    1,198
    Comparisons
    937
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    448
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Adaptive EAM
    Learn More
    Overview

    Adaptive Enterprise Architecture Manager (EAM) is a robust MOF-compliant knowledge repository solution for organizing, integrating and analyzing information about the key architecture elements of an enterprise. Adaptive EAM captures and monitors the full scope of enterprise architecture initiatives, enabling performance monitoring and enterprise governance on a holistic scale.

    A Dynamic and Data-Driven Approach to Enterprise Architecture
    Engage and connect stakeholders across the organization with business-friendly visualizations understandable to all.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Schibsted, Government of Malmo, Torvald
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government8%
    Retailer6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Architecture Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management. Updated: April 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Adaptive Enterprise Architecture Manager is ranked 33rd in Enterprise Architecture Management while Ardoq is ranked 12th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 2 reviews. Adaptive Enterprise Architecture Manager is rated 0.0, while Ardoq is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ardoq writes "Provides stable performance and scalability but not intuitive for data modeling". Adaptive Enterprise Architecture Manager is most compared with , whereas Ardoq is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, BiZZdesign HoriZZon, MEGA HOPEX and ADOIT.

    See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.