Compare AdaptiveMobile Messaging Security vs. Cisco Email Security

AdaptiveMobile Messaging Security is ranked 39th in Messaging Security while Cisco Email Security is ranked 1st in Messaging Security with 15 reviews. AdaptiveMobile Messaging Security is rated 0, while Cisco Email Security is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Email Security writes "Black-listing and white-listing are highly intuitive and easy to do". AdaptiveMobile Messaging Security is most compared with , whereas Cisco Email Security is most compared with FireEye Email Security, Fortinet FortiMail and Proofpoint Email Protection.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use AdaptiveMobile Messaging Security? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Proofpoint and others in Messaging Security. Updated: May 2020.
419,794 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
It is not that costly. We pay for the solution through a contractor and pay an annual fee.We were using Proofpoint and then we switched to Cisco... reportability was one of the main reasons we switched, but the biggest one was cost. If you can get an equivalent functionality for a better price it's wise to do so. That's what our primary decision came down to: We could get equivalent functionality at a lower price point.There were no other costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.The license was not per user, the license model was per feature. You could choose anti-virus, anti-spam, etc. It was feature-based and charged yearly.Licensing costs depend on how many users there are. It could range between $5 and $7 per month, per user.Pricing depends on your environment and which model you want to buy.In addition to the standard licensing, there is a cost for SMARTnet as well.We do annual licensing for ESA and SMA together, and possibly SmartNet support. Packaged together, the cost is just under $38,000.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Messaging Security solutions are best for your needs.
419,794 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
39th
out of 57 in Messaging Security
Views
13
Comparisons
7
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
1st
out of 57 in Messaging Security
Views
9,163
Comparisons
5,616
Reviews
14
Average Words per Review
825
Avg. Rating
8.6
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
IronPort, Cisco Email Security, ESA, Email Security Appliances
Learn
AdaptiveMobile
Cisco
Overview

AdaptiveMobile Security provides advanced protection against cybercrime that is exploiting the mobile messaging channel and can help operators, aggregators and inter-exchange carriers take the right steps to tackle a broad range of challenges to their messaging services. Using distributed real-time autonomous AI policy decision engines to implement-advanced network control and leveraging Machine Learning techniques to build advanced threat detection algorithms and trust reputation scoring, the Messaging Protection platform can identify and block attacks, render useless advanced persistent attackers’ infrastructure and prevent the use of private information by automated messaging attack campaigns. Ensuring the security of an operator’s current and future messaging services and enforcing personal preferences and privacy.

Customers of all sizes face the same daunting challenge: email is simultaneously the most important business communication tool and the leading attack vector for security breaches. Cisco Email Security enables users to communicate securely and helps organizations combat Business Email Compromise (BEC), ransomware, advanced malware, phishing, spam, and data loss with a multilayered approach to security.

Offer
Learn more about AdaptiveMobile Messaging Security
Learn more about Cisco Email Security
Sample Customers
AT&T, Claro, Omantel, TelcelSUNY Old Westbury, CoxHealth, City of Fullerton, Indra
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company29%
Manufacturing Company14%
Financial Services Firm7%
Healthcare Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider28%
Software R&D Company19%
Energy/Utilities Company18%
Media Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise44%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise78%
Large Enterprise16%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Proofpoint and others in Messaging Security. Updated: May 2020.
419,794 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Messaging Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.