Compare AdaptiveMobile Messaging Security vs. Cisco Email Security (ESA)

AdaptiveMobile Messaging Security is ranked 35th in Messaging Security while Cisco Email Security (ESA) is ranked 1st in Messaging Security with 16 reviews. AdaptiveMobile Messaging Security is rated 0, while Cisco Email Security (ESA) is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Email Security (ESA) writes "Black-listing and white-listing are highly intuitive and easy to do". AdaptiveMobile Messaging Security is most compared with , whereas Cisco Email Security (ESA) is most compared with Fortinet FortiMail, Proofpoint Email Protection and FireEye Email Security.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use AdaptiveMobile Messaging Security? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Barracuda Networks and others in Messaging Security. Updated: October 2019.
372,622 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
It is not that costly. We pay for the solution through a contractor and pay an annual fee.We were using Proofpoint and then we switched to Cisco... reportability was one of the main reasons we switched, but the biggest one was cost. If you can get an equivalent functionality for a better price it's wise to do so. That's what our primary decision came down to: We could get equivalent functionality at a lower price point.There were no other costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.The license was not per user, the license model was per feature. You could choose anti-virus, anti-spam, etc. It was feature-based and charged yearly.Licensing costs depend on how many users there are. It could range between $5 and $7 per month, per user.Pricing depends on your environment and which model you want to buy.In addition to the standard licensing, there is a cost for SMARTnet as well.We do annual licensing for ESA and SMA together, and possibly SmartNet support. Packaged together, the cost is just under $38,000.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Messaging Security solutions are best for your needs.
372,622 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
35th
out of 43 in Messaging Security
Views
6
Comparisons
2
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
1st
out of 43 in Messaging Security
Views
9,157
Comparisons
5,774
Reviews
15
Average Words per Review
840
Avg. Rating
8.7
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
IronPort, Cisco Email Security
Learn
AdaptiveMobile
Video Not Available
Cisco
Overview

AdaptiveMobile Security provides advanced protection against cybercrime that is exploiting the mobile messaging channel and can help operators, aggregators and inter-exchange carriers take the right steps to tackle a broad range of challenges to their messaging services. Using distributed real-time autonomous AI policy decision engines to implement-advanced network control and leveraging Machine Learning techniques to build advanced threat detection algorithms and trust reputation scoring, the Messaging Protection platform can identify and block attacks, render useless advanced persistent attackers’ infrastructure and prevent the use of private information by automated messaging attack campaigns. Ensuring the security of an operator’s current and future messaging services and enforcing personal preferences and privacy.

Customers of all sizes face the same daunting challenge: email is simultaneously the most important business communication tool and the leading attack vector for security breaches. Cisco Email Security enables users to communicate securely and helps organizations combat Business Email Compromise (BEC), ransomware, advanced malware, phishing, spam, and data loss with a multilayered approach to security.

Offer
Learn more about AdaptiveMobile Messaging Security
Learn more about Cisco Email Security (ESA)
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
SUNY Old Westbury, CoxHealth, City of Fullerton, Indra
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company29%
Manufacturing Company14%
Healthcare Company14%
Legal Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Energy/Utilities Company36%
Comms Service Provider20%
Software R&D Company13%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise50%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise77%
Large Enterprise13%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Barracuda Networks and others in Messaging Security. Updated: October 2019.
372,622 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Messaging Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email