Adexa eGPS vs Terra Technology comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Adexa Logo
110 views|61 comparisons
Terra Technology Logo
32 views|24 comparisons
Ranking
7th
out of 21 in Demand Management
Views
110
Comparisons
61
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
14th
out of 21 in Demand Management
Views
32
Comparisons
24
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
eGPS
Learn More
Terra Technology
Video Not Available
Overview

The Adexa “Enterprise Global Planning System” (eGPS) is a comprehensive suite of integrated solutions for manufacturers. It delivers a robust enterprise business planning solution that encompasses supply chain planning, event management, enterprise performance management, and intelligent collaboration that helps maximize asset utilization within and beyond the walls of your company. Adexa provides a local and global view of supply and demand requirements and constraints and the insight needed to optimize them. The result? Greater speed and profitability across multi-tiered supply chains.

Information Not Available
Sample Customers
Microchip Technology Inc., Skyworks Solutions Inc., Silicon Laboratories Inc., Integrated Device Technology Inc., Analog Devices Inc.
AkzoNobel, Campbell Soup, Church & Dwight, ConAgra Foods, Ecolab, General Mills, Kellogg, Kimberly-Clark, Kraft Heinz, Mondelez, Procter & Gamble, Reckitt Benckiser, Shell, Unilever

Adexa eGPS is ranked 7th in Demand Management while Terra Technology is ranked 14th in Demand Management. Adexa eGPS is rated 0.0, while Terra Technology is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Adexa eGPS is most compared with QAD Enterprise Applications, whereas Terra Technology is most compared with .

See our list of best Demand Management vendors.

We monitor all Demand Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.