Compare Adobe AIR vs. Genero

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Adobe AIR Logo
244 views|201 comparisons
Genero Logo
226 views|76 comparisons
Ranking
Views
244
Comparisons
201
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
226
Comparisons
76
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 68% of the time.
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 100% of the time.
Learn
Adobe
FourJs
Overview

The Adobe AIR runtime enables developers to package the same code into native apps for Windows and Mac OS desktops as well as iPhone, iPad, Kindle Fire, Nook Tablet, and other Android™ devices, reaching the mobile app stores for over 500 million devices. 

Genero Enterprise comprises Studio – a visual programming development framework that models apps from three basic diagrams that describe: the application workflow, the database relationships and the user interface. The application is generated from these diagrams using customizable code templates that can be adapted to suit your own corporate needs and standards. Custom business rules can be inserted using Code Editor – a language sensitive editor that corrects syntax in real-time. Develop in teams, locally and remotely via the Subversion source code control system.
Offer
Learn more about Adobe AIR
Learn more about Genero
Sample Customers
France T_l_visionsAsus, PBS, AT&T, CVS Pharmacy, LHDN Malaysia, Fox Conn, Xcel Energy, Kmart, Debswana, Reiff Groupe, UK Ministry of Defence, BBC, Biel, Sears

Adobe AIR is ranked 6th in .NET Development Services while Genero is ranked 8th in .NET Development Services. Adobe AIR is rated 0.0, while Genero is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Adobe AIR is most compared with Adobe Flash and Microsoft Silverlight, whereas Genero is most compared with Microsoft Visual Studio.

See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.

We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.