Ranking | |
Views 244 Comparisons 201 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 226 Comparisons 76 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
![]() Compared 68% of the time. ![]() Compared 32% of the time. | ![]() Compared 100% of the time. |
Learn | |
Adobe | FourJs |
Overview | |
The Adobe AIR runtime enables developers to package the same code into native apps for Windows and Mac OS desktops as well as iPhone, iPad, Kindle Fire, Nook Tablet, and other Android™ devices, reaching the mobile app stores for over 500 million devices. | Genero Enterprise comprises Studio â a visual programming development framework that models apps from three basic diagrams that describe: the application workflow, the database relationships and the user interface. The application is generated from these diagrams using customizable code templates that can be adapted to suit your own corporate needs and standards. Custom business rules can be inserted using Code Editor â a language sensitive editor that corrects syntax in real-time. Develop in teams, locally and remotely via the Subversion source code control system. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Adobe AIR | Learn more about Genero |
Sample Customers | |
France T_l_visions | Asus, PBS, AT&T, CVS Pharmacy, LHDN Malaysia, Fox Conn, Xcel Energy, Kmart, Debswana, Reiff Groupe, UK Ministry of Defence, BBC, Biel, Sears |
Adobe AIR is ranked 6th in .NET Development Services while Genero is ranked 8th in .NET Development Services. Adobe AIR is rated 0.0, while Genero is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Adobe AIR is most compared with Adobe Flash and Microsoft Silverlight, whereas Genero is most compared with Microsoft Visual Studio.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.