Adobe Captivate vs QuarkXPress comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Adobe Logo
108 views|58 comparisons
QuarkXPress Logo
199 views|103 comparisons
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This product is part of the larger Adobe Creative Cloud offering, which costs about $600 USD per year."
  • More Adobe Captivate Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Publishing Software solutions are best for your needs.
    763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Adobe Captivate is a complex software. You can create many complex learnings with it. T
    Top Answer:There is no Captivate subscription in India, whereas US and other markets have. It is cheaper than its competitors.
    Top Answer:The older or classic version of Adobe Captivate needs much improvement because everything looks very old. It needs to improve how it works. Also, new features are missing too. The latest version is… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    2nd
    Views
    108
    Comparisons
    58
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    357
    Rating
    8.0
    3rd
    Views
    199
    Comparisons
    103
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Captivate
    Quark
    Learn More
    Overview
    Adobe Captivate software reimagines the way interactive eLearning is created for a multi-device world. Develop any-screen mobile learning without programming using all-new responsive authoring.

    Quark Publishing Platform (QPP) NextGen is content automation software for modular, metadata-driven and compliance-controlled omnichannel publishing. QPP automates every stage of content lifecycle management – creation, collaboration, assembly, publishing and analysis – so organizations can modernize their content ecosystems to support digital transformation, customer satisfaction, revenue generation and regulatory compliance. SaaS delivery also reduces complexity, infrastructure costs and time to value and you can deploy the software in a public or private cloud environment. Whatever your corporate and industry requirements and however you want to architect it – as an end-to-end publishing solution or integrated with existing IT and business systems – QPP powers your content, your way.

    Sample Customers
    GAAP Dynamic, Ceresti Health, ThinkBuzan, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, Design Goat, meLearning Solutions, The BRITE Initiative, Kineo
    Lufthansa Cargo, L'Appor, Vicor, Peugeot, Sud Ouest Group, Louis Vitton, London College of Communication, Agency Kreativdienst, Incisive Media Ltd, BNP Paribas, Autodata Ltd., Irish Government, Salvation Army, Thomas Cook, IBM Microelectronics, Savannah College of Art and Design, The University of Kentucky

    Adobe Captivate is ranked 2nd in Publishing Software with 1 review while QuarkXPress is ranked 3rd in Publishing Software. Adobe Captivate is rated 8.0, while QuarkXPress is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Adobe Captivate writes "Enables you to create many complex E-learnings ". On the other hand, Adobe Captivate is most compared with Pluralsight, FrameMaker and iSpring Suite, whereas QuarkXPress is most compared with FrameMaker.

    See our list of best Publishing Software vendors.

    We monitor all Publishing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.