Compare Adobe CQ5 vs. HP Autonomy TeamSite

Adobe CQ5 is ranked 9th in Web Content Management while HP Autonomy TeamSite is ranked 16th in Web Content Management. Adobe CQ5 is rated 0, while HP Autonomy TeamSite is rated 0. On the other hand, Adobe CQ5 is most compared with Magnolia CMS, HP Autonomy TeamSite and Sitecore Experience Manager, whereas HP Autonomy TeamSite is most compared with Adobe CQ5, SharePoint and OpenText Web Experience Management.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Adobe CQ5 Logo
1,350 views|1,184 comparisons
HP Autonomy TeamSite Logo
663 views|545 comparisons
Ranking
9th
Views
1,350
Comparisons
1,184
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
16th
Views
663
Comparisons
545
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Joomla and others in Web Content Management. Updated: October 2019.
377,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 42% of the time.
Compared 31% of the time.
Also Known As
CQ5Autonomy TeamSite, HP Autonomy TeamSite
Learn
Adobe
HP
Overview

Adobe CQ web content management provides a browser-based user interface for both business and IT to create interactive, media-enriched, multichannel customer experiences to build an engaging digital presence, drive more effective campaigns and grow online customer communities. 

HP Autonomy TeamSite can help you meet a wide range of content management demands content authoring, multichannel delivery, site design and layout, multivariate testing, content targeting, rich media management, advanced analytics, social content management, workflow and approval, and archiving.
Offer
Learn more about Adobe CQ5
Learn more about HP Autonomy TeamSite
Sample Customers
Boehringer IngelheimEDF, Morgan Stanley, RateCity, Missouri State Courts
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Joomla and others in Web Content Management. Updated: October 2019.
377,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email