• Home
  • Adobe CQ5 vs. Olapic

Adobe CQ5 vs Olapic comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Adobe Logo

Adobe CQ5

Read 1 Adobe CQ5 review
559 views|470 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Monotype Logo

Olapic

62 views|54 comparisons
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adobe CQ5 and Olapic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Web Content Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Brand management, Digital Transformation of organization and Most dynamic site.
Brand management, Digital Transformation of organization and Most dynamic site.
Use Olapic?
Ranking
9th
out of 48 in Web Content Management
Views
559
Comparisons
470
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
33rd
out of 48 in Web Content Management
Views
62
Comparisons
54
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CQ5
Learn More
Adobe
Monotype
Video Not Available
Overview

Adobe CQ web content management provides a browser-based user interface for both business and IT to create interactive, media-enriched, multichannel customer experiences to build an engaging digital presence, drive more effective campaigns and grow online customer communities. 

Automate the ongoing management of influencers and the content they create with the Olapic Creator Platform. Whether you work with a select few or a large network of influencers, the Creator Platform helps remove the manual work from these processes using an intelligent CRM and logistics engine to centralize influencer relationships, contributed content, and performance reporting.
Sample Customers
Boehringer Ingelheim
Timberland, TAGHeuer, Nixon, Essie, New balance, Topshop, Cole Haan, Alex and Ani, Tacori, Vans, Bebe, The North Face, Calvin Klein, Desigual, Thompson Hotels, Sears, jetBlue
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm17%
Computer Software Company14%
Construction Company9%
Retailer9%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise78%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Adobe CQ5 is ranked 9th in Web Content Management while Olapic is ranked 33rd in Web Content Management. Adobe CQ5 is rated 10.0, while Olapic is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Adobe CQ5 writes "Brand management, Digital Transformation of organization and Most dynamic site". On the other hand, Adobe CQ5 is most compared with Adobe Experience Manager, whereas Olapic is most compared with .

See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.