• Home
  • Adobe Digital Enterprise Platform vs. OpenText Content Manager

Adobe Digital Enterprise Platform vs OpenText Content Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adobe Digital Enterprise Platform and OpenText Content Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Adobe Digital Enterprise Platform?
Giovanny-Buitrago
A solution for managing content with low maintenance
The first advantage is integration with your IP directory. You can customize any metadata and centralize all content, making it accessible to... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I would suggest that you do a thorough evaluation of all competing products and look for support for these products in your local area."
  • "The fees incurred are for the licensing and maintenance."
  • "I rate the product price an eight or nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The solution is expensive."
  • "The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money. You have to pay a one-time cost and support costs."

    • More OpenText Content Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Micro Focus Content Manager?
    Top Answer:An advantage is integration with your IP directory.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Conte...
    Top Answer:The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money. You have to pay a one-time cost and support costs. You will have to pay more… more »
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Micro Focus Content Manager?
    Top Answer:Support could be enhanced. The first line of support consists of individuals who lack experience with some key aspects. When you create a support ticket, the time to resolve the issue may be prolonged… more »
    Read all 7 answers   →
    Ranking
    29th
    out of 46 in Enterprise Content Management
    Views
    90
    Comparisons
    77
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    10th
    out of 46 in Enterprise Content Management
    Views
    1,921
    Comparisons
    881
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    410
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Digital Enterprise Platform
    Micro Focus Content Manager, HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager
    Learn More
    Adobe
    OpenText
    Overview

    Adobe Digital Enterprise Platform (ADEP) provides a set of software, tools, and services for

    building applications that can deliver engaging customer experiences across multiple digital
    channels and devices.

    OpenText Content Manager, formerly Records Manager, is a governance-based enterprise content management system designed to help government agencies, regulated industries and global organizations manage their business content from creation to disposal. Regardless of how you create and collaborate on your content, Content Manager gives you the ability to leverage accurate, contextual, and complete information throughout its lifecycle. Managing your content in this way helps you significantly improve services to your customers, business decisions and insight for future strategy.

    Sample Customers
    Janus Health
    Missouri State Courts
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Government58%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Non Profit8%
    Non Tech Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise35%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise55%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Adobe Digital Enterprise Platform is ranked 29th in Enterprise Content Management while OpenText Content Manager is ranked 10th in Enterprise Content Management with 21 reviews. Adobe Digital Enterprise Platform is rated 0.0, while OpenText Content Manager is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Content Manager writes "A document management system that integrates well with SAP, Salesforce and Oracle ". Adobe Digital Enterprise Platform is most compared with Nuxeo, whereas OpenText Content Manager is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM, OpenText Documentum, IBM FileNet and Microsoft Purview Records Management.

    See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.