Compare Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms vs. IBM BPM

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms Logo
3,258 views|1,783 comparisons
IBM BPM Logo
16,848 views|12,600 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It should provide more flexibility to connect with external systems, and there should be in-built services that can be used to integrate with other systems quickly.""Its price is on the higher side, and it can be improved. Its licensing is on a yearly basis. There are no additional costs.""IBM could improve the price. It is far too expensive.""I wish it was less expensive. I don't know why their pricing model is so high for a piece of software that could benefit so many. It just seems to me that they could have a lower cost, maybe with fewer features or whatever, but it should be possible to do a lower cost workflow software that uses the same interface and underlying engine but does not cost so much that you have to be a Fortune 50 company to buy it. It is annoying to me. There are a lot of solutions that IBM has that are really powerful but nobody can afford them. They know their business, but I still feel that there are a lot of customers who would benefit from this sort of thing. I don't know what this elitism is all about. I am sure they have people doing the money numbers, but it seems like you can make a lot more money by selling it to way more people for a little bit less.""When considering the features of the solution the price is expensive compared to competitors.""It's expensive. All software is always extremely high. The manufacturing cost that we have compared to the selling cost, it's not like you're building a house or building a car. But putting that aside, considering that it's expensive, it's a lot of money. If you compare it with some of the other alternatives in the market, it's a similar price. For instance, if you compare it with Pegasystems, it's a similar price.""The price of the solution is fair for an enterprise solution that has both cloud and on-premise deployments and when comparing to competitors. Recently IBM has introduced Cloud Pak which allows for more flexible licensing options for automation and other features."

More IBM BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CCM solutions are best for your needs.
512,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The integration and design are valuable features.
Top Answer: When considering the features of the solution the price is expensive compared to competitors.
Top Answer: The interface is limited and should improve in the future. We are having to develop an extended application to avoid the limitation in the interface design.
Ranking
3rd
out of 19 in CCM
Views
3,258
Comparisons
1,783
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
16,848
Comparisons
12,600
Reviews
21
Average Words per Review
548
Rating
7.6
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Adobe LiveCycle
WebSphere Lombardi Edition, IBM Business Process Manager, IBM WebSphere Process Server
Learn More
Overview
Adobe LiveCycle is an enterprise document and form platform that helps you capture and process information, deliver personalized communications, and protect and track sensitive information. LiveCycle extends business processes to your mobile workforce and clients, increasing productivity while broadening service access to any user equipped with a desktop, smartphone, or tablet.
IBM Business Process Manager is a comprehensive BPM platform giving you visibility and insight to manage business processes. It scales smoothly and easily from an initial project to a full enterprise-wide program harnesses complexity in a simple environment to better meet customer needs.
Offer
Learn more about Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms
Learn more about IBM BPM
Sample Customers
State of Illinois, Department of Human Services
Barclays, EmeriCon, Banca Popolare di Milano, CST Consulting, KeyBank, KPMG, Prolifics, Sandhata Technologies Ltd., State of Alaska, Humana S.A., Saperion, esciris, Banco Espirito Santo
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm13%
Insurance Company11%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm60%
Insurance Company17%
Computer Software Company9%
Non Tech Company3%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Financial Services Firm17%
Comms Service Provider17%
Insurance Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise68%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business7%
Midsize Enterprise31%
Large Enterprise62%

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms is ranked 3rd in CCM while IBM BPM is ranked 6th in Business Process Management with 20 reviews. Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms is rated 0.0, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "A very stable and powerful tool for handling lots of concurrent users, but it is expensive, and the Eclipse-based tool has performance issues when you have a lot of developers". Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms is most compared with OpenText Exstream, Smart Communications, Pega BPM, Appian and Quadient Inspire, whereas IBM BPM is most compared with IBM Business Automation Workflow, Camunda Platform, Pega BPM, Apache Airflow and ARIS BPA.

See our list of .

We monitor all CCM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.