• Home
  • Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms vs. OpenText Document Sciences xPression [EOL]

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms vs OpenText Document Sciences xPression [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Its flexibility and customization ability. Ease of initial setup and complete set of features to support digital...
My organization provides expert services to other organizations implementing AEM based solutions. Our clients usually tell us the main benefit they... Read more →
David Nixon
Integration with Adobe Suite was great, but there were too many limitations based on the composition tools used
xPression was touted as a future solution, but didn't meet needs and therefore was replaced. Limitations of functions compared to the tool it was... Read more →
Ranking
4th
out of 28 in Customer Communications Management (CCM)
Views
917
Comparisons
722
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Customer Communications Management (CCM)
Comparisons
Also Known As
Adobe LiveCycle
EMC Document Sciences xPression
Learn More
Adobe
OpenText
Overview
Adobe LiveCycle is an enterprise document and form platform that helps you capture and process information, deliver personalized communications, and protect and track sensitive information. LiveCycle extends business processes to your mobile workforce and clients, increasing productivity while broadening service access to any user equipped with a desktop, smartphone, or tablet.
OpenText Document Sciences xPression Enterprise Edition helps utomates the generation of highly customized and personalized multichannel customer communications. With xPression, you can replace multiple document generation systems to reduce costs, streamline processes, and improve customer experience. It consolidate multiple single purpose and disparate systems onto a single flexible platform for all types of vital business communications. OpenText Document Sciences xPression Enterprise Edition automates the generation of millions of documents per hour, while supporting thousands of concurrent users, to increase operational efficiency, reduce costs, and ensure accuracy. It leverage familiar tools from Microsoft and Adobe to generate personalized and customized correspondence, contracts, statements, and marketing materials on-demand, interactively, and in high-volume batch and it uses industry standards such as Java, XML and Web Services to integrate with various operating systems, application servers, databases, and other existing enterprise systems.
Sample Customers
State of Illinois, Department of Human Services
Aksigorta, EmblemHealth, Independence Blue Cross, Sammons Financial Group, State Department of Labor, American Medical Security
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm22%
Computer Software Company13%
Government12%
Insurance Company7%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise76%
No Data Available

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms is ranked 4th in Customer Communications Management (CCM) while OpenText Document Sciences xPression [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Customer Communications Management (CCM). Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms is rated 8.6, while OpenText Document Sciences xPression [EOL] is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms writes "Its flexibility and customization ability. Ease of initial setup and complete set of features to support digital marketing initiatives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Document Sciences xPression [EOL] writes "Integration with Adobe Suite was great, but there were too many limitations based on the composition tools used". Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms is most compared with Appian, OpenText Exstream, Smart Communications, Quadient Inspire and Tungsten TotalAgility, whereas OpenText Document Sciences xPression [EOL] is most compared with QuarkXPress.

See our list of best Customer Communications Management (CCM) vendors.

We monitor all Customer Communications Management (CCM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.