Compare Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms vs. Pega BPM

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The licensing fees are based on the number of users.""May be somewhat more expensive than other solutions initially, but should have enhanced return on investment.""The price of this solution, including installation and configuration, is comparable to competing vendors.""The pricing is pretty good, compared to other similar products.""It's a user-based license where, as you scale the numbers of users, the price increases."

More Pega BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CCM solutions are best for your needs.
464,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The solution offers excellent workflows.
Top Answer: We're constantly evaluating other products. We're looking at others on the market right now.
Top Answer: There are some UX shortcomings within the solution. However, it's my understanding that they have addressed them and in the next three months they will come out with a new updated version. They will… more »
Ranking
3rd
out of 19 in CCM
Views
3,408
Comparisons
1,784
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
17,143
Comparisons
12,925
Reviews
15
Average Words per Review
591
Rating
8.4
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Adobe LiveCycle
Pegasystems, SmartBPM
Learn More
Overview
Adobe LiveCycle is an enterprise document and form platform that helps you capture and process information, deliver personalized communications, and protect and track sensitive information. LiveCycle extends business processes to your mobile workforce and clients, increasing productivity while broadening service access to any user equipped with a desktop, smartphone, or tablet.

Pega BPM helps you simplify and automate your operations so that you can reduce costs and improve business agility. Pega's unique Build For Change technology delivers repeatable solutions that can be efficiently reused and tailored to meet the requirements of diverse customers, product lines, channels, and geographies.

Offer
Learn more about Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms
Learn more about Pega BPM
Sample Customers
State of Illinois, Department of Human Services
The State of Maine, ANZ, Coca-Cola, Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA), ME, New South Wales, OptumRx, Texas Department of Transportation, UnitedHealthcare Medicare & Retirement
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm10%
Insurance Company9%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm44%
Computer Software Company38%
Retailer6%
Real Estate/Law Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm13%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise79%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise74%

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms is ranked 3rd in CCM while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management with 15 reviews. Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms is rated 0.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Good case management and BPM workflow with easy cloud implementation". Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms is most compared with OpenText Exstream, Smart Communications, Adobe Captivate, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with Camunda BPM, ServiceNow, Appian and IBM BPM.

See our list of .

We monitor all CCM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.