We performed a comparison between Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OutSystems, Mendix, Salesforce and others in Mobile Development Platforms."I think it's the best content management system, fulfilling all the requirements of a CMS tool."
"I have found Adobe Experience Manager Mobile to be reliable."
"The most valuable features of OutSystems are the user interface, the flexibility to quickly integrate with almost anything in the system, and the ability to connect with databases."
"It is much easier to develop applications with the product’s IDE."
"We used almost all of the features, themes, styling guide, and approach components. They are useful in our applications."
"In terms of user support and community engagement, I rate the tool a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it allows users to easily build applications."
"We can quickly develop an application using the tool."
"The most valuable feature of OutSystems is the drag and drop and toolchains in the small AI developing environment. Additionally, the documentation is helpful."
"Reduces the manual labor in compiling and deploying applications and generating procedural code (by reducing development bureaucracy/processes, resulting in real gains). The LifeTime Server approach, requiring just a few steps to publish applications in production environments, is fantastic."
"The license cost is too high, and customers hesitate to implement this solution."
"Adobe Experience Manager Mobile could be improved by making it much easier to share the design system between different projects."
"The tutorials for the solution should be updated."
"I think OutSystems needs to improve in many areas. First, sometimes Service Studio becomes really slow and even hangs for long periods. Also, if I have not published my module in some time, and some kind of Service Studio exception occurs, I lose my work."
"The initial setup is a little difficult."
"In OutSystems, cloud management is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The installation is a bit tedious."
"When shared extensions are updated, all the applications are redeployed."
"OutSystems does not provide any native reporting resources. All reports must be created with other tools or as a webpage."
"Currently, in mobile applications, we don't have push notifications."
More Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Mobile Development Platforms with 2 reviews while OutSystems is ranked 1st in Mobile Development Platforms with 46 reviews. Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] is rated 7.6, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] writes "Fulfills all the requirements of a CMS tool and is stable and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend ". Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and Oracle Application Express (APEX).
See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.