We performed a comparison between Adobe Flash and Microsoft Visual Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two .NET Development Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I am impressed with the tool’s documentation."
"The UI is really good."
"Adobe Flash is simple and easy-to-use software. It is very familiar and compatible with other Adobe software, making it easier to use."
"Without Adobe Flash player, I wouldn't be able to do my day-to-day functions."
"With the alliance with Microsoft, the product is perfectly integrated."
"We can use different .NET features."
"I like it that I don't need any special software to run this program."
"It's pretty prevalent."
"The most valuable features are the extensions."
"The feature I find most valuable is the fact that it's broad-spectrum, so it can be used for a wide variety of technologies."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Visual Studio is the good intelligence and UI."
"Microsoft Visual Studio is an easy-to-use solution."
"This solution can integrate with almost any functionality offered by Microsoft."
"Adobe can focus on the gaming side mode."
"It would be ideal if there was more research on the product available."
"It would be nice to have more integration and faster integration."
"It would be nice to see Adobe Flash as a separate application instead of embedding it with other apps. I want the product to be a simple app. The product’s scalability is also one of its weak points."
"At times it can be slow, but other than that it is a great and helpful product."
"There could be more coding languages in the solution."
"Microsoft Visual Studio needs to improve integration."
"It is simple to use for most developers and nearly impossible to use for non-developers."
"With the free version, we don't have that much support for Visual Studio. Its support is a little bit less and can be better."
"IntelliSense could be better."
"The interface could be more user friendly"
"Microsoft Visual Studio can improve by adding more features to the Mac version. There are a lot of features lacking in the Mac version, there are limitations. I can install Microsoft Visual Studio on the Mac operating system, but it is not the same as if I installed it on a Microsoft Windows system. The Microsoft Windows version has a lot of features available in Microsoft Visual Studio."
"Could be improved with the ability to personalize the interface and development style and to edit extension requirements."
Adobe Flash is ranked 4th in .NET Development Services with 5 reviews while Microsoft Visual Studio is ranked 1st in .NET Development Services with 79 reviews. Adobe Flash is rated 9.0, while Microsoft Visual Studio is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Adobe Flash writes "Easy to set up with good functionality and adaptability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Visual Studio writes "Easy to use, works well in the Microsoft Windows ecosystem, and integrates well with Git". Adobe Flash is most compared with Microsoft Silverlight and Adobe AIR, whereas Microsoft Visual Studio is most compared with SharePoint Designer, Genero and JBuilder. See our Adobe Flash vs. Microsoft Visual Studio report.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.