We performed a comparison between Adobe Sign and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Docusign, Adobe, Dropbox and others in eSignature (Electronic Signature)."I would recommend this solution to other people. It is an easy-to-use solution and one of the best."
"It makes it very easy to sign documents."
"I give the stability a ten out of ten."
"I adore using Adobe Sign since it feels intuitive and user-friendly. Its organic design makes it effortless to navigate, so even if you lack experience with Adobe software, you can quickly learn and use it accurately."
"Adobe Sign is a reliable product with good support and a continuous improvement process in place."
"Regarding the most valuable feature of the solution, I would say that it is easy to use."
"Adobe Sign is highly reliable and offers additional features such as 25-year retention filters and audit capabilities."
"The ability to sign digitally is very convenient."
"It has made us faster and more efficient."
"Helps with document collaboration and workflow."
"Its configuration management ability is critical for document-based systems."
"It has good integration with other MS products."
"This solution has helped us with the categorization, organization, management, discovery, and delivery of program and project related information."
"SharePoint has an option where you can open files on the browser, whereby more than five people can make amendments to one Excel online file."
"The search feature is valuable."
"The online editing capabilities, file sharing, auditing, information security, ease of solution management, and the easy user adaptation to the platform are the most valuable features."
"It works. I have no notes for improvement."
"I think that the performance could be better and so could the auto-updates when filling in new columns and information."
"The solution could always be more secure."
"One limitation of Adobe Sign is the restriction of adding only one email address for an Adobe Sign account. This can cause issues at times because Adobe Sign does not permit multiple signed accounts with the same email address."
"The support could improve in Adobe Sign."
"It is hard to keep up with continuous improvements."
"The solution's UI can be made simpler and easy to use so that I can have the option to make changes if needed."
"The price of the solution could improve for certain plans."
"It is too heavy. MS should not have paid foreign coders dollars per each row of code. They wasted the stability and reliability in the end."
"You still need a bit of expertise to add branding."
"SharePoint Online could improve the user interface and when modifying any of the user interfaces can be challenging. Additionally, there are challenges with the detail in the analytics user interface and the overall customization could improve."
"It will fully use your system resources."
"Workflow is something that can become more intelligent."
"More hints and make it more user-customizable."
"Document management and the ability to easily integrate single sign-on (SSO) are areas for improvement in SharePoint."
"The product must provide more automation."
Adobe Sign is ranked 2nd in eSignature (Electronic Signature) with 9 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 146 reviews. Adobe Sign is rated 9.4, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Adobe Sign writes "Highly scalable and accessible ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Adobe Sign is most compared with DocuSign, Citrix RightSignature, OpenText Core Signature and SignNow, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and WordPress.
We monitor all eSignature (Electronic Signature) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
