We performed a comparison between ADP Streamline and PeopleSoft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Benefits Administration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature was that everything was in one system."
"I like the reporting feature as it allows me to generate reports independently without relying on a payroll consultant."
"The advantage was that ADP Streamline was inherently designed to serve as a marketing engine for the company."
"They are very strong in terms of having a central regional system. A regional person can see and monitor the calendar for each different country."
"The new version of this solution is very scalable."
"A valuable feature is FSCM."
"All the features of the solution are integral to the functionality. Additionally, the navigation customization is beneficial."
"The customizations allow us to come up with a lot of complex labor rules. In the Philippines, there's a lot of different kinds of rules you need to be in compliance with. The solution offers up a lot of flexibility and customization that is perfect for our region's requirements."
"The time system is what we get the most benefit from."
"PeopleSoft is a good core system. They frequently update the solution and recently they have added some good enhancement features for higher education. We just switched to the new fluid interface and that is working very well for us. It is very good."
"Peoplesoft is the best payroll software in the market."
"This solution integrates very well with other products which is helpful."
"The UI could be improved to be a bit more modern or trendy because it looks old-fashioned compared to other systems."
"They could improve the service relationship manager (SRM), because they have an SRM which is not familiar with Simple."
"I think there is a need for a deeper level of comprehension."
"Having more clear guidance on design and training would be beneficial."
"Having applications which provide more enhanced features and user-friendly elements."
"We have already deployed it and we have had it for several years but we are switching to a modern HCM SaaS cloud product."
"Initial setup can be complex without training or use of consultants."
"It would be helpful for the end-user if the reports were customized. They would be able to select the fields while generating their reports."
"The area that could be improved is the upgrade process, it's not the easiest. Oracle stopped supporting our version. So we have to move either to the cloud or work in a non-supported situation. That was certainly a disadvantage. That's also the reason why we decided not to stay with Oracle. Now we are moving to SAP."
"I would like to see a better UI."
"Areas that need improvement are the add-ons to the fluid pages and additional features in SCM and finance, both functionally and technically."
"Stability is an area where the solution lacks and needs to be improved."
ADP Streamline is ranked 11th in Benefits Administration with 7 reviews while PeopleSoft is ranked 3rd in Benefits Administration with 80 reviews. ADP Streamline is rated 8.4, while PeopleSoft is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ADP Streamline writes "Simplifies payroll processing and reduces the need for extensive marketing efforts while providing scalability, compliance, and excellent stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". ADP Streamline is most compared with ADP GlobalView Payroll, ADP Global Payroll, UKG and ADP Workforce Now, whereas PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP SuccessFactors and SAP ERP. See our ADP Streamline vs. PeopleSoft report.
See our list of best Benefits Administration vendors.
We monitor all Benefits Administration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.