We performed a comparison between ADTRAN Bluesocket Wireless and Ubiquiti WLAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cisco, Ruckus and others in Wireless LAN.
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"The solution is stable."
"The simplicity is great."
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"I believe the initial setup was straightforward."
"The ease of use and simplicity of the solution is its most valuable feature. This tool is best suited for small environments."
"Great management interface."
"The solution is very easy to install."
"All of the interfacing is very good."
"would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. It is very scalable."
"It is similar to the switches, where it is one of those things where it just works. They are very reliable."
"Ubiquiti WLAN has good performance."
"Ubiquiti provides good connectivity for the end-user, so I think it's stable."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"The solution is expensive."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
"The price could be better."
"Support is not really up to par in quickly addressing issues."
"Having a better dashboard management system that the client can use to access and control their environment would be a nice addition to the product."
"Its scalability, UI, and security features could be better."
"When they release new products, you should know if there backward compatibility, or do you have to replace the entire forklift, It is useful to understand their strategy and where they are headed."
"When I started to upgrade, the controller for Unbuntu was really struggling to start up, however, that has since been solved."
"The strength of the signal from the access points could be improved."
"The solution is stable but could improve."
"Ubiquiti WLAN needs to expand the models with external antennas. It needs to improve stability."
"I have never used cloud solutions. My first approach would be something related to the cloud, and backups on the cloud, and maybe an easier way to connect to it because I have an on-premises environment."
"I have found they need to work on the stability of the solution."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
ADTRAN Bluesocket Wireless is ranked 27th in Wireless LAN while Ubiquiti WLAN is ranked 5th in Wireless LAN with 35 reviews. ADTRAN Bluesocket Wireless is rated 6.6, while Ubiquiti WLAN is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of ADTRAN Bluesocket Wireless writes "Access points work but there are problems with support, scalability, and keeping technology current". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti WLAN writes "Helps to build VPNs but improvement is needed in stability ". ADTRAN Bluesocket Wireless is most compared with , whereas Ubiquiti WLAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Omada Access Points and WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
