We performed a comparison between Agile Manager [EOL] and PractiTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."How you write your user stories, and the requirements gathering, in Agile Manager is pretty good."
"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"The testing module that we are used to, that wasn't there at all."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
Agile Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while PractiTest is ranked 20th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Agile Manager [EOL] is rated 7.6, while PractiTest is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Agile Manager [EOL] writes "We have the ability to define common standard procedures and methodologies. I'm looking for better integration using Octane". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". Agile Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas PractiTest is most compared with TestRail, Zephyr Enterprise, Jira and Microsoft Azure DevOps.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
