Compare AgilePoint vs. IBM BPM

AgilePoint is ranked 22nd in Business Process Management with 1 review while IBM BPM is ranked 1st in Business Process Management with 36 reviews. AgilePoint is rated 8.0, while IBM BPM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AgilePoint writes "Makes form implementation easier and has an easy to use interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "The most valuable feature is the Analytics, but more emphasis is needed on process improvement". AgilePoint is most compared with Nintex Workflow, K2 blackpearl and IBM BPM, whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda BPM, ARIS BPM and Pega BPM.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AgilePoint Logo
1,173 views|932 comparisons
IBM BPM Logo
13,219 views|8,990 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Comindware, Software AG and others in Business Process Management. Updated: October 2019.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth.

Read more »

This solution has streamlined our operation and improved the TAT of sales, operations, and underwriters.This solution is very stable.It excels at analytics. It provides visibility across all activities of a company's processes and performance.It helps improve your process through continual measurement.It helps maintain, and in many instances, lower costs, as well as to maintain those costs, keeping them stable.It continues to keep up with the changing needs of the business. That is the strong value proposition of BPM. It's not a one-time automation.Provides the power to understand and automate processes.Our customers use the solution as a workflow platform to manage their processes.

Read more »

Cons
While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta.

Read more »

We care about technology and support because support is very important and a BPM is not easy to implement.I would like to see a lot more case studies.The user experience, while it has improved, should continue to improve.The business would like to use the product with a lot less IT and equipment involvement.Better integration with other products in the automation suite.Also, we would like to see integration with artificial intelligence, machine learning-type of technical capabilities. Right now, there are a lot Watson libraries out there. Building those integrations more, out-of-the-box, from IBM would be a good direction.I would like it more documentation during the design phase.We would appreciate more user-friendly definitions of processes with a more user-friendly interface for documenting processes.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
It should provide more flexibility to connect with external systems, and there should be in-built services that can be used to integrate with other systems quickly.The cloud and license of the subscription model for IBM BPM can be complex. There are a lot of alternatives to choose from.It has a low cost to implement. You'll get your money back in the same year that you complete the project.Our customers do see ROI. They'll identify some particularly painful or uncoordinated processes to start with, then build out from there, picking off low hanging fruit.We chose to purchase IBM BPM because it was bundled with the actual RPA program/solution that we decided to purchase. We decided to use Automation Anywhere tool (RPA), and it is was bundled with IBM BPM.It gives us a good return on investment.​We have definitely seen ROI. When we first kicked it off, we said it had to pay for itself within three years, and it did.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,173
Comparisons
932
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
526
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
13,219
Comparisons
8,990
Reviews
39
Average Words per Review
562
Avg. Rating
7.9
Top Comparisons
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
WebSphere Lombardi Edition, IBM Business Process Manager, IBM WebSphere Process Server
Learn
AgilePoint
IBM
Overview

AgilePoint NX is a top-five low-code platform that empowers you to quickly build anything from simple eforms and workflows to complex, multi-tenant SaaS apps, IoT apps, and composite LOB systems without writing code and at a price almost any enterprise can afford.

IBM Business Process Manager is a comprehensive BPM platform giving you visibility and insight to manage business processes. It scales smoothly and easily from an initial project to a full enterprise-wide program harnesses complexity in a simple environment to better meet customer needs.
Offer
Learn more about AgilePoint
Learn more about IBM BPM
Sample Customers
Caja Laboral, Elbit Systems, Daisy BrandBarclays, EmeriCon, Banca Popolare di Milano, CST Consulting, KeyBank, KPMG, Prolifics, Sandhata Technologies Ltd., State of Alaska, Humana S.A., Saperion, esciris, Banco Espirito Santo
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm62%
Insurance Company29%
Non Tech Company5%
Healthcare Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm20%
Software R&D Company20%
Comms Service Provider15%
Insurance Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Comindware, Software AG and others in Business Process Management. Updated: October 2019.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email