We performed a comparison between Airlock and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."Our customers are more than satisfied with the user experience provided by the product."
"There is a lot of documentation available."
"It is very intuitive, easy to deploy, and manage."
"NetFlow balancing and traffic balancing are good features."
"Tech support has been very quick to respond to all of the needs that we've had. If you want ad-hoc support. They also provide professional services that you can purchase as well."
"It is a very good, flexible solution. It helps us to catch up on flaws in our partner solutions on top of its load balancing feature."
"The stability is excellent."
"The solution is very easy to use and easy to understand. It's quite an intuitive system."
"The web application firewall feature is the most valuable and useful feature. It is a leading industry product when it comes to load balancing. Its user interface is very simple. There isn't a steep learning curve. When we initiate someone to F5, they start using it quickly."
"The tool must be simplified."
"Its scalability and deployment should be better. It should be more scalable, and it should be easier to deploy."
"The solution could improve the documentation."
"The GUI needs improvement."
"The pricing could always be better. It's a bit expensive."
"I would like to see F-5 implement a regular routing like in other Linux-based devices. When we try and integrate in some complex networks, we have to use some additional routing scenarios from a Layer 3 perspective, then we have some problems. It would be great if this were fixed somehow."
"In terms of what could be improved, I would expect more integration with different platforms and more integration with the backend systems. Additionally, in the next release, I would like a more secure version."
"The cost of the solution is pretty high. It would be ideal if it was more reasonable."
"F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is sometimes a bit cumbersome to deal with some builds, although that's gotten significantly better over the years."
More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Airlock is ranked 22nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review while F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is ranked 1st in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 116 reviews. Airlock is rated 10.0, while F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Airlock writes "Provides endless features and can be adapted to every single application that exists in the world". On the other hand, the top reviewer of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) writes "Helps deliver applications to users in a reliable, secure, and optimized way". Airlock is most compared with AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Citrix Web App and API Protection, HUMAN BotGuard for Applications and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is most compared with Citrix NetScaler, Fortinet FortiADC, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, NGINX Plus and HAProxy.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
