Airlock vs NGINX App Protect comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ergon Informatik Logo
434 views|344 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
F5 Logo
3,450 views|2,597 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Airlock and NGINX App Protect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Our customers are more than satisfied with the user experience provided by the product."

More Airlock Pros →

"The most valuable feature of NGINX App Protect is its open source.""NGINX App Protect has complete control over the HTTP session.""The most valuable feature of NGINX App Protect is its flexibility.""The most valuable feature is that I can establish different services from the firewall.""The most valuable feature of NGINX App Protect is the reverse proxy.""It has the best documentation features.""WAF is useful to track mitigation, inclusion, prevention, and the parametric firewall.""The policies are flexible based on the technologies you use."

More NGINX App Protect Pros →

Cons
"The tool must be simplified."

More Airlock Cons →

"It's challenging if you need to go for a high throughput.""Currently, the policies have to be handled manually, and you have to create from scratch, which can be a bit time-consuming, in a large environment.""The setup of NGINX App Protect is complex. The full process took one week to complete. Additionally, we had to change the network infrastructure platform which took one month.""The configuration needs to be more flexible because it is difficult to do things that are outside of the ordinary.""Right now, the tool doesn't provide an option revolving around update feeds, specifically the signature update option in the UI.""I encountered issues with NGINX App Protect while trying to upgrade custom rules.""The price of NGINX App Protect could improve.""The product's user interface is an area with shortcomings as it can be quite confusing for users, making it an area where improvements are required."

More NGINX App Protect Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing fees for this solution are pretty expensive for what it does, but there is no alternative."
  • "Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year."
  • "Really understand the licensing model, because we underestimated that."
  • "There are no additional fees."
  • "NGINX is not expensive."
  • "The pricing is reasonable because NGINX operates on an instance basis."
  • "There is a license needed to use NGINX App Protect."
  • "There are not any additional costs we had to pay to use NGINX App Protect."
  • More NGINX App Protect Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Our customers are more than satisfied with the user experience provided by the product.
    Top Answer:The tool is cheap. We are protecting very sensitive portals. We didn't have a single incident for the last 15 years.
    Top Answer:The tool must be simplified. However, if it is simplified, it will lose its competitive edge. The solution requires advanced administrators. However, it has endless features. It would be good if it… more »
    Top Answer:The solution has yearly, three-year, and five-year subscriptions.
    Top Answer:NGINX App Protect could provide a better user interface.
    Ranking
    Views
    434
    Comparisons
    344
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    442
    Rating
    10.0
    Views
    3,450
    Comparisons
    2,597
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    334
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Airlock Suite
    NGINX WAF, NGINX Web Application Firewall
    Learn More
    Overview

    The problem of internet security is almost as old as the internet itself. But there is a reliable solution: Airlock Suite from Ergon. Airlock Suite is underpinned by superb Swiss engineering expertise, many years of experience and well thought-out concepts that master the most complex challenges. Airlock Suite deals with the issues of filtering and authentication in one complete and coordinated solution - setting new standards for usability and services.

    NGINX App Protect application security solution combines the efficacy of advanced F5 web application firewall (WAF) technology with the agility and performance of NGINX Plus. The solution runs natively on NGINX Plus and addresses some of the most difficult challenges facing modern DevOps environments:

    • Integrating security controls directly into the development automation pipeline
    • Applying and managing security for modern and distributed application environments such as containers and microservices
    • Providing the right level of security controls without impacting release and go-to-market velocity
    • Complying with security and regulatory requirements

    NGINX App Protect offers:

    • Expanded security beyond basic signatures to ensure adequate controls
    • F5 app‑security technology for efficacy superior to ModSecurity and other WAFs
    • Confidently run in “blocking” mode in production with proven F5 expertise
    • High‑confidence signatures for extremely low false positives
    • Increases visibility, integrating with third‑party analytics solutions
    • Integrates security and WAF natively into the CI/CD pipeline
    • Deploys as a lightweight software package that is agnostic of underlying infrastructure
    • Facilitates declarative policies for “security as code” and integration with DevOps tools
    • Decreases developer burden and provides feedback loop for quick security remediation
    • Accelerates time to market and reduces costs with DevSecOps‑automated security
    Sample Customers
    Raiffeisen, SGKB, Generali, Visana
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government10%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Comms Service Provider33%
    Insurance Company17%
    Computer Software Company17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Airlock is ranked 22nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review while NGINX App Protect is ranked 15th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 19 reviews. Airlock is rated 10.0, while NGINX App Protect is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Airlock writes "Provides endless features and can be adapted to every single application that exists in the world". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NGINX App Protect writes "Capable of complete automation but is costly ". Airlock is most compared with AWS WAF, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Citrix Web App and API Protection and HUMAN BotGuard for Applications, whereas NGINX App Protect is most compared with AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Noname Security.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.