Compare Airlock vs. NGINX Web Application Firewall

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Amazon, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2021.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The licensing fees for this solution are pretty expensive for what it does, but there is no alternative.""Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year."

More NGINX Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: WAF is useful to track mitigation, inclusion, prevention, and the parametric firewall.
Top Answer: Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year. We pay on an annual basis. We just have our operating costs on top of that.
Top Answer: The solution does well when there's low throughput but when we go for any high throughput, it's always a challenge. I'm expecting the next version to have a better high throughput. I also find that… more »
Ranking
Views
384
Comparisons
307
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
2,697
Comparisons
2,218
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
584
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Airlock Suite
NGINX WAF
Learn More
Overview

The problem of internet security is almost as old as the internet itself. But there is a reliable solution: Airlock Suite from Ergon. Airlock Suite is underpinned by superb Swiss engineering expertise, many years of experience and well thought-out concepts that master the most complex challenges. Airlock Suite deals with the issues of filtering and authentication in one complete and coordinated solution - setting new standards for usability and services.

Even when you understand security, it is difficult to create secure applications, especially when working under the pressures so common in today’s enterprise. The NGINX Web Application Firewall (WAF) protects applications against sophisticated Layer 7 attacks that might otherwise lead to systems being taken over by attackers, loss of sensitive data, and downtime. The NGINX WAF is based on the widely used ModSecurity open source software.

Offer
Learn more about Airlock
Learn more about NGINX Web Application Firewall
Sample Customers
Raiffeisen, SGKB, Generali, Visana
m.a.x IT
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company25%
Media Company9%
Financial Services Firm5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Amazon, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2021.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Airlock is ranked 32nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while NGINX Web Application Firewall is ranked 13th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 3 reviews. Airlock is rated 0.0, while NGINX Web Application Firewall is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of NGINX Web Application Firewall writes "A stable system with good security and load balancing". Airlock is most compared with AWS WAF, F5 BIG-IP, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Citrix Web App and API Protection, whereas NGINX Web Application Firewall is most compared with AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Imperva Incapsula.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.