Compare Airlock vs. NGINX Web Application Firewall
Use Airlock? Share your opinion.
 | Anonymous User Product Manager - Technical at a tech services company |
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Amazon, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2021.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Information Not Available
"The licensing fees for this solution are pretty expensive for what it does, but there is no alternative."
"Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year."
More NGINX Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice »
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Top Answer: WAF is useful to track mitigation, inclusion, prevention, and the parametric firewall.
Top Answer: Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year. We pay on an annual basis. We just have our operating costs on top of that.
Top Answer: The solution does well when there's low throughput but when we go for any high throughput, it's always a challenge. I'm expecting the next version to have a better high throughput. I also find that… more »
Views
384
Comparisons
307
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
2,697
Comparisons
2,218
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
584
Rating
8.0
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Airlock Suite
NGINX WAF
The problem of internet security is almost as old as the internet itself. But there is a reliable solution: Airlock Suite from Ergon. Airlock Suite is underpinned by superb Swiss engineering expertise, many years of experience and well thought-out concepts that master the most complex challenges. Airlock Suite deals with the issues of filtering and authentication in one complete and coordinated solution - setting new standards for usability and services.
Even when you understand security, it is difficult to create secure applications, especially when working under the pressures so common in today’s enterprise. The NGINX Web Application Firewall (WAF) protects applications against sophisticated Layer 7 attacks that might otherwise lead to systems being taken over by attackers, loss of sensitive data, and downtime. The NGINX WAF is based on the widely used ModSecurity open source software.
Learn more about Airlock
Learn more about NGINX Web Application Firewall
Raiffeisen, SGKB, Generali, Visana
m.a.x IT
No Data Available
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company25%
Media Company9%
Financial Services Firm5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Amazon, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2021.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Airlock is ranked 32nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while NGINX Web Application Firewall is ranked 13th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 3 reviews. Airlock is rated 0.0, while NGINX Web Application Firewall is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of NGINX Web Application Firewall writes "A stable system with good security and load balancing". Airlock is most compared with AWS WAF, F5 BIG-IP, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Citrix Web App and API Protection, whereas NGINX Web Application Firewall is most compared with AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Imperva Incapsula.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.