Compare Akamai CloudTest vs. LoadRunner Cloud

Akamai CloudTest is ranked 10th in Performance Testing Tools with 2 reviews while LoadRunner Cloud is ranked 4th in Performance Testing Tools with 3 reviews. Akamai CloudTest is rated 7.6, while LoadRunner Cloud is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Akamai CloudTest writes "Helps to cater to on-demand capacity and load and is easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LoadRunner Cloud writes "The best feature is that we don't have to build and maintain infrastructure anymore". Akamai CloudTest is most compared with BlazeMeter, LoadRunner and Apache JMeter, whereas LoadRunner Cloud is most compared with LoadRunner, Performance Center and Apache JMeter. See our Akamai CloudTest vs. LoadRunner Cloud report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. LoadRunner Cloud and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
390,232 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible.The solution is very stable.

Read more »

The most valuable feature is having load generators in countries where we don’t have access to them.Keeping up with DevOps, thus the best feature of StormRunner is that we don't have to build and maintain infrastructure anymore.It's fast, easy to use, has a user-friendly UI, and you can split users.

Read more »

Cons
Akamai cloud test integration into our current CI/CD pipelines (i.e.) identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market/release.The test clip should be more user-friendly.

Read more »

An area for improvement is analytics on why response times are slow from certain countries.There is a steep learning curve for the product, too.It doesn't provide custom reports. You can only use the default reports which contain irrelevant data or is missing data that we need.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
390,232 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
10th
Views
2,624
Comparisons
1,463
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
450
Avg. Rating
7.5
Views
7,925
Comparisons
5,193
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
533
Avg. Rating
8.7
Top Comparisons
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 55% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
SOASTA CloudTestStormRunner Load, Micro Focus StormRunner Load, HPE StormRunner Load
Learn
Akamai
Micro Focus
Overview

Soasta's CloudTest rapidly builds realistic test scenarios using real user data, then tests, analyzes and repairs faster. CloudTest's visual test environment and real-time analytics test your website, mobile app and api backend to give you a streaming view of all your performance data while tests run from back-end systems to front end performance.

Micro Focus StormRunner Load is a simple, smart and scalable solution for Agile Cloud testing. It helps you to detect performance issues and ensure that your mobile and web apps are ready for the load. It provides an Intelligent and predictive analytics for fast problem detection and scale up to millions of user in minutes from different regions.

Offer
Learn more about Akamai CloudTest
Learn more about LoadRunner Cloud
Sample Customers
Chester ZooN Brown Group, aHOC
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider30%
Software R&D Company18%
Media Company15%
Financial Services Firm10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company49%
Comms Service Provider12%
Government6%
Retailer6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. LoadRunner Cloud and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
390,232 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.