Compare Akamai CloudTest vs. Neotys NeoLoad

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Akamai CloudTest Logo
2,288 views|1,297 comparisons
Neotys NeoLoad Logo
7,293 views|3,960 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. Neotys NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is very stable.""The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible."

More Akamai CloudTest Pros »

"It helped in achieving the testing of on-premise applications, as well as cloud-based applications, without much difficulty.""NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution.""I like the scripting and parameterization features.""The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good.""The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad.""The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to.""Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good."

More Neotys NeoLoad Pros »

Cons
"The test clip should be more user-friendly.""Akamai cloud test integration into our current CI/CD pipelines (i.e.) identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market/release."

More Akamai CloudTest Cons »

"NeoLoad does not support Citrix-based applications.""While importing the scripts from backup it should not create the new variables because it has created some issues for us.""I would like to see support for auto-correlations.""Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing.""Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols.""Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue."

More Neotys NeoLoad Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The licensing cost is less compared to other licensing performance testing tools.""Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based."

More Neotys NeoLoad Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad.
Top Answer: Overall, we're quite satisfied with the product. Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is… more »
Top Answer: We primarily use the solution for load testing. Our focus is not so much performance testing. We focus more on load testing, which does inadvertently include performance testing, however.
Ranking
12th
Views
2,288
Comparisons
1,297
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
450
Rating
7.5
Views
7,293
Comparisons
3,960
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
287
Rating
8.7
Popular Comparisons
Compared 39% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Also Known As
SOASTA CloudTestNeoLoad
Learn
Akamai
Neotys
Video Not Available
Overview

Soasta's CloudTest rapidly builds realistic test scenarios using real user data, then tests, analyzes and repairs faster. CloudTest's visual test environment and real-time analytics test your website, mobile app and api backend to give you a streaming view of all your performance data while tests run from back-end systems to front end performance.

The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.

Offer
Learn more about Akamai CloudTest
Learn more about Neotys NeoLoad
Sample Customers
Chester ZooDell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company10%
Retailer8%
REVIEWERS
Retailer19%
Government19%
Individual & Family Service13%
Computer Software Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider12%
Insurance Company7%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise74%
Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. Neotys NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Akamai CloudTest is ranked 12th in Performance Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Neotys NeoLoad is ranked 4th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews. Akamai CloudTest is rated 7.6, while Neotys NeoLoad is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Akamai CloudTest writes "Helps to cater to on-demand capacity and load and is easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neotys NeoLoad writes "Easy to build test cases, good stability and good scalability". Akamai CloudTest is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, whereas Neotys NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise and Silk Performer. See our Akamai CloudTest vs. Neotys NeoLoad report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.