Akamai CloudTest vs Tricentis Flood comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Akamai Logo
689 views|469 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Tricentis Logo
505 views|372 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Akamai CloudTest and Tricentis Flood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Load Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten.""This is an awesome performance testing tool for web based applications, able to generate load multiple geographies, dynamic ramp-up to any levels of virtual users.""The solution is very stable.""The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible."

More Akamai CloudTest Pros →

"You can utilize this tool on the cloud, and also access application on-premises. That is a very good part of the solution.""Their technical support is awesome.""The most valuable feature is the support for Java, where we can quickly code what we need."

More Tricentis Flood Pros →

Cons
"In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load.""Akamai cloud test integration into our current CI/CD pipelines (i.e.) identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market/release.""The test clip should be more user-friendly.""It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

More Akamai CloudTest Cons →

"We used an implementation strategy to deploy the solution, not because of the tools, but mainly because of the scripting part of the tool.""The solution is quite immature, it is not in an optimal state.""The performance of the tool needs to improve."

More Tricentis Flood Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Running cost is very low."
  • "We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."
  • More Akamai CloudTest Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This solution is in the average price range compared to other testing tools."
  • "The only positive point is it came free with my test automation tool."
  • More Tricentis Flood Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise… more »
    Top Answer:In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling… more »
    Top Answer:We use this solution mostly for generating loads for a couple of our retail clients, especially for holiday readiness. We want to get our system up and running to get ready for unpredicted loads. So… more »
    Top Answer:Tricentis Flood is the kind of versatile load and performance testing solution that my organization and I cannot help but recommend. It is recognized by companies across a wide variety of fields as a… more »
    Ranking
    11th
    out of 25 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    689
    Comparisons
    469
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    745
    Rating
    8.0
    18th
    out of 25 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    505
    Comparisons
    372
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SOASTA CloudTest
    Flood IO
    Learn More
    Overview

    Soasta's CloudTest rapidly builds realistic test scenarios using real user data, then tests, analyzes and repairs faster. CloudTest's visual test environment and real-time analytics test your website, mobile app and api backend to give you a streaming view of all your performance data while tests run from back-end systems to front end performance.

    Tricentis Flood is a cloud-based platform for load testing that assists teams in determining how their applications respond to loads that are distributed across the world. This solution makes load testing more accessible to developers and testers by lowering the complexity typically connected with it. By adding load testing into their CI/CD pipelines, teams can start testing the performance of their application components as they develop and continuously track the effects on the system's overall performance.

    Tricentis Flood enables DevOps load testing. In addition, it enables DevTest teams to get quick and continuous performance feedback. Because Tricentis Flood and Tosca are integrated, you can use the same scriptless tests you use for functional testing to perform load testing. In addition to supporting conventional protocol-level load-testing techniques, Tricentis Flood also enables testers to do load tests at the browser level without becoming bogged down in technical specifics.

    As new features are being developed, teams can begin load testing them. Without having to deal with the headaches of requesting, setting, or managing performance resources on premises or in the cloud, a developer or tester can rapidly produce millions of globally dispersed requests per second from their local PC.

    Tricentis Flood distributes test plans over widely accessible cloud servers using open-source tools like JMeter, Gatling, and Selenium. Additionally, it enables you to instantly "flood" any HTTP endpoint.

    Tricentis Flood Features

    Tricentis Flood has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • The Browser Level User method reduces script generation, maintenance, and complexity overheads.
    • Tosca Flood integration, enabling seamless load testing for both UI and API-based test scenarios.
    • Enhanced economy of scale with cloud-based load generation across multiple global geographic locations.
    • Tool-agnostic, with the ability to integrate with new tools as they become available.
    • Cluster-less, shared-nothing architecture, which allows users to scale up for very large tests without the bottlenecks that more traditional setups experience.
    • Real-time reports on a shareable, intuitive, and interactive dashboard.
    • Long-term data storage allows you to evaluate performance over time.
    • Test-friendly pricing, where you pay for the infrastructure you utilize, not per test or per simulated user.

    Tricentis Flood Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing Tricentis Flood. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Simple methods for defining, creating, and maintaining load tests.
    • On-demand platform for executing load tests at scale.
    • Analysis and visualization of results in real time.
    • Continuous monitoring of performance across time.

    Sample Customers
    Chester Zoo
    Nike, heroku, Soulcycle, NEC, boston.com, Typeform, Xero, Telus
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Insurance Company11%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Retailer10%
    Real Estate/Law Firm7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise79%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Buyer's Guide
    Load Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Akamai CloudTest is ranked 11th in Load Testing Tools with 6 reviews while Tricentis Flood is ranked 18th in Load Testing Tools. Akamai CloudTest is rated 7.6, while Tricentis Flood is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Akamai CloudTest writes "Is easy to use and quick to setup, and does not require much resource capacity for medium instances". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Flood writes "Need improvements ,but has cloud and on-premises options". Akamai CloudTest is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise, Tricentis NeoLoad and BlazeMeter, whereas Tricentis Flood is most compared with Tricentis NeoLoad, BlazeMeter and OpenText LoadRunner Cloud.

    See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.