We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Akamai Kona Site Defender vs. Signal Sciences

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Microsoft, Amazon and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: October 2021.
541,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Akamai is very expensive.""There is no license at all for Akamai. They are going to charge us only for the usage.""The price they are offering is quite reasonable for premium customers, but it's very expensive if you're a small and medium-sized enterprises."

More Akamai Kona Site Defender Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
541,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution can scale extremely well.
Top Answer: The product really isn't very user-friendly. They could improve it so that it's easier for their customers to navigate and use. From a management perspective, it's difficult. Managing these rules with… more »
Top Answer: We primarily use the solution as an application firewall.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
8,769
Comparisons
6,935
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
396
Rating
8.2
Views
2,408
Comparisons
1,634
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Kona Site Defender, Kona
Signal Sciences Next-Gen WAF, Signal Sciences RASP
Learn More
Fastly
Video Not Available
Overview
Akamai's Kona Site Defender extends security beyond the data center while maintaining site performance and availability in the face of fast-changing threats. It leverages the power of the Akamai Intelligent Platform to detect, identify and mitigate Denial-of-Service (DoS) and Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks before they ever reach the origin.

Signal Sciences' next-gen web application firewall (WAF) and runtime application self protection (RASP) increase security and maintain reliability without sacrificing velocity - all at the lowest total cost of ownership.

Offer
Learn more about Akamai Kona Site Defender
Learn more about Signal Sciences
Sample Customers
AvidMobile, itBit
Chef, Adobe, Datadog, Etsy, GrubHub, Vimeo, SendGrid, Under Armour, Duo, AppNexus
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Financial Services Firm15%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business30%
Large Enterprise70%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Microsoft, Amazon and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: October 2021.
541,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Akamai Kona Site Defender is ranked 9th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 6 reviews while Signal Sciences is ranked 24th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Akamai Kona Site Defender is rated 8.2, while Signal Sciences is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Akamai Kona Site Defender writes "Great technical support, scales extremely well, and is very stable". On the other hand, Akamai Kona Site Defender is most compared with Akamai Prolexic Routed, AWS WAF, F5 Shape Security and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, whereas Signal Sciences is most compared with AWS WAF, Cloudflare, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Sqreen and PerimeterX Bot Defender.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.