Akana API Management vs webMethods.io API comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Perforce Logo
1,714 views|1,528 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Software AG Logo
250 views|281 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Akana API Management and webMethods.io API based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in API Management.
To learn more, read our detailed API Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Saurav Krishna
KHALEDALQAHTANI
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Good interface, intuitive solution.""The tool's authentication mechanism is easy to implement. We had to define a few parameters.""It allowed us to publish and replace pre-essential transactions in one place, with a uniformity in terms of control and policies."

More Akana API Management Pros →

"The performance is good.""Clients choose webMethods.io API for its intuitive interface, promoting seamless interaction and quick communication between systems."

More webMethods.io API Pros →

Cons
"The product has new features that we are going to implement in the next few months, such as API management and analytic reporting.""Lacks an integrated billing feature.""Akana API Management needs to improve its documentation."

More Akana API Management Cons →

"I would like the solution to provide bi-weekly updates.""A potential drawback of webMethods.io API is its adaptability to legacy systems, which can vary in compatibility."

More webMethods.io API Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "For us, the pricing and licensing policies were for an on-premise installation with a fixed cost structure, that matched our budgeting policies."
  • More Akana API Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool's authentication mechanism is easy to implement. We had to define a few parameters.
    Top Answer:Akana API Management needs to improve its documentation.
    Top Answer:Clients choose webMethods.io API for its intuitive interface, promoting seamless interaction and quick communication between systems.
    Top Answer:A potential drawback of webMethods.io API is its adaptability to legacy systems, which can vary in compatibility. This becomes evident when dealing with diverse products within a client's portfolio… more »
    Top Answer:The primary use case of the solution is for our digital sale tool.
    Ranking
    27th
    out of 64 in API Management
    Views
    1,714
    Comparisons
    1,528
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    208
    Rating
    8.0
    30th
    out of 64 in API Management
    Views
    250
    Comparisons
    281
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    142
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    webMethods API Management, webMethods API Cloud
    Learn More
    Overview

    Akana helps businesses accelerate digital transformation by securely extending their reach across multiple channels – mobile, cloud and Internet of Things. Akana enables enterprises to share data as APIs, connect and integrate applications, drive partner adoption, monetize their assets, and provide intelligent insights into their business and operations.

    If you’re joining the API economy, you need an API management platform that brings it all together for you. API management powered by webMethods is a complete and end-to-end platform, covering design, development, deployment, security, publishing and monitoring of your APIs and services. Use it to unlock the business value of unique data and services, and take advantage of mobile first, open API, hybrid integration, Internet of Things (IoT) and service governance initiatives. Reach new customers and partners, find new sources of revenue and leverage your development community. Now available in the cloud!

    Sample Customers
    British American Tobacco, Credit Suisse, Daimler, eBay, FOX, Liberty Mutual, Marriott, Mayo Clinic, Skandia, Tata communications
    Clal
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Healthcare Company11%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise78%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    API Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in API Management. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Akana API Management is ranked 27th in API Management with 3 reviews while webMethods.io API is ranked 30th in API Management with 2 reviews. Akana API Management is rated 8.4, while webMethods.io API is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Akana API Management writes "Authentication mechanism is easy to implement but improvement is needed in documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io API writes "Offers a strategic toolset for gradual integration advancement". Akana API Management is most compared with Apigee, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Amazon API Gateway, Microsoft Azure API Management and Kong Gateway Enterprise, whereas webMethods.io API is most compared with Apigee and MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager.

    See our list of best API Management vendors.

    We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.