Compare Akana Software Suite vs. TIBCO Hawk

Akana Software Suite is ranked 10th in SOA Governance while TIBCO Hawk is ranked 12th in SOA Governance. Akana Software Suite is rated 0, while TIBCO Hawk is rated 0. On the other hand, Akana Software Suite is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite, whereas TIBCO Hawk is most compared with Actional.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Akana Software Suite Logo
110 views|84 comparisons
TIBCO Hawk Logo
97 views|43 comparisons
Ranking
10th
out of 18 in SOA Governance
Views
110
Comparisons
84
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
12th
out of 18 in SOA Governance
Views
97
Comparisons
43
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Learn
Rogue Wave
TIBCO
Overview

The Akana Platform provides an end-to-end API Management solution for designing, implementing, securing, managing, monitoring, and publishing APIs. It is available as a SaaS platform, on-premises, and as a hybrid deployment.

TIBCO Hawk is a tool for monitoring and managing distributed applications and systems throughout the enterprise. With Hawk, system administrators can monitor application parameters, behavior, and loading activities for all nodes in a local or wide-area network and take action when pre-defined conditions occur. In many cases, runtime failures or slowdowns can be repaired automatically within seconds of their discovery, reducing unscheduled outages and slowdowns of critical business systems.
Offer
Learn more about Akana Software Suite
Learn more about TIBCO Hawk
Sample Customers
HealthDirect, The State of California Department of Water Resources, ADT, Aflac, Alberta Health Services, Allianz, American AirlinesBunge, Marks and Spencer, Pirelli, Smart & Final
We monitor all SOA Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.