Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management and Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Architecture Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
AlanJackson
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The taxonomy support across all the phases is the most advantageous feature.""The most valuable features of this solution are its customizability, and flexibility in the configuration.""The initial setup was straightforward. It takes two to three days to set up the environment. One person was able to handle the implementation."

More Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management Pros →

"The solution is stable. We haven't had any serious technical issues."

More Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility Pros →

Cons
"The user experience, the layout and the different technologies behind the presentations are a bit old. These need to be updated. They should focus on web development. It's simply not supporting the current user experience guidelines.""The product is not great at implementing security frameworks across an end-to-end supply chain.""We would like to see the visualization of assets, as well as artificial intelligence techniques to assist us in making our decisions."

More Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management Cons →

"The user interface needs improvement. The solution needs to add a few features to improve the overall user experience. Security needs to be strengthened as well."

More Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:The taxonomy support across all the phases is the most advantageous feature.
Top Answer:The ability for Alfabet to acknowledge use cases that are specifically business-based and not technology-based and better integrate those process designs across the spectrum could be improved. The… more »
Top Answer:I work for a systems integrator and we are end users. Organizations using this product are enterprise-size, our largest customer has 30,000 users. One customer had use cases built on sourcing raw… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
963
Comparisons
665
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
776
Rating
7.0
Views
79
Comparisons
35
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
System Architecture Management Utility
Learn More
Overview

Software AG's Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management Platform provides a collaborative platform for aligning the IT landscape with the business to guide competitive transformation. You can describe complex IT systems in terms of their business, application, information and technical layers, and develop standards for change. Build the foundation for business-IT transformation with an accurate, real-time picture of the IT landscape, including all applications and technologies, the inter-relationships between them, the information they exchange as well as the business organizations and processes they support.

Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility (SAMU) generates compelling diagrams about EA, is a true repository, which comes with best practice meta-model, report definitions and settings and provides the right platform to model the dynamism of the environment and manage transformation from planning to completion. SAMU provides seamless communication that develop a common understanding about architecture and share knowledge which provides complexity that is presented simply on a straight-forward, query-based and auto-generated diagrams.
Sample Customers
Metro Bank, Credit Suisse
Waterworks of Budapest
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Government15%
Financial Services Firm12%
Computer Software Company10%
Insurance Company7%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise71%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Architecture Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management is ranked 13th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 3 reviews while Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility is ranked 32nd in Enterprise Architecture Management. Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management is rated 7.6, while Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management writes "Great taxonomy support but raw business processing should be upgraded". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility writes "A stable scalable solution with mid-range price points". Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management is most compared with LeanIX, MEGA HOPEX, iServer, BiZZdesign HoriZZon and Avolution ABACUS, whereas Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility is most compared with .

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.