We performed a comparison between Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management and ARIS BPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Broadcom, ServiceNow and others in Project Portfolio Management."The dashboard is the most valuable feature."
"The matrix model makes building relations easier."
"The BPMN notation and the share flow through users. It is nice to see all flows in a common, shared space for all the stakeholders to view the same thing and the same language."
"It has helped me get some ideas across more clearly to my colleagues."
"It brings transparency and 360-degree views of end-to-end processes."
"The stability of the ARIS BPM platform is quite good. The nice thing about it is the central database, where we can use all of our data. We can even manage users."
"ARIS provides the basic foundation for any digital transformation an organization decides to take."
"It has allowed us to model our enterprise process architecture."
"ARIS BPA provides very good visibility and control of processes because we have a concurrent license system. As a result, every person in our company and group is able to look at the published processes."
"The user-experience, enhanced performance, and in-hand governance can be improved."
"Sometimes, ARIS BPA breaks down, and its stability can be improved."
"The product is difficult to use for someone without prior knowledge of working with it. It requires a certain level of administration training."
"I use it strictly for developing the business process model. I don't use it for the actual automation. I do that with Vtenext. I have standardized on Vtenext, and I don't use ARIS BPM anymore. The Vtenext UI is just as good, and it is much more tightly coupled to the underlying object model. I can get more done in one session with Vtenext rather than first going to ARIS BPM, then importing, and having to edit it for tight coupling."
"While the dashboarding solution for integrating all kinds of process-related information from company sources other than ARIS is getting ever better, my personal wish would be to have a module that is more targeted to an Agile implementation of some modeled processes (model–to-execute)."
"The reporting capabilities and the ability to create custom reports need to be simplified and made easy so that people even with a good functional understanding of the tool can leverage it to create their own custom report."
"Needs flexibility in automation of the modeling processes and real-time analysis of data, not just a static view."
"One thing that could be improved is regarding the handling of the content itself. Maybe ARIS could provide a set of best practices, or best processes, so that people do not have to start from scratch."
"The usability. Others tools are easier to manage without same complexity that ARIS has."
More Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management is ranked 14th in Project Portfolio Management with 4 reviews while ARIS BPA is ranked 4th in Business Process Design with 64 reviews. Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management is rated 7.6, while ARIS BPA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management writes "Helps us to implement and understand the status of our projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management is most compared with ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, LeanIX, Alfabet FastLane, Jira and Broadcom Clarity , whereas ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Camunda and Pega BPM.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
