We performed a comparison between Quest InTrust and USM Anywhere based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Datadog, Wazuh and others in Log Management."I would rate the technical support very well as they are knowledgeable and quick to respond."
"On any given day I could give you a different answer regarding the most valuable features of the product. The feature that is most important is the fact that it has a lot of features, that it's not just a log collection and correlation system, that it has a lot of other components built in. The bundle of features is really the killer feature."
"Reports are customized, so you can present them to executives or engineers."
"This solution can identify many threats inside the organization (compromised endpoints, configuration issues), as well as "outside" threats (botnets, network scanners, web-attacks, etc)."
"Allowed us to help our customers satisfy compliance needs around logging and monitoring."
"I can easily check (in one place) all the logs and data in relation to attacks. It also gives me an overview if a server is not configured properly."
"The vulnerability scanning is helpful to identify the areas that need patching or fixes installed."
"This solution can completely detect and prevent incidents on your network."
"The AlienVault solution has enabled us to create a SOC on a budget with smaller than usual staff requirements, offering a wider range of solutions for our customers."
"It was very complex. There was poor native correlation. "
"It needs to have better reporting. "
"We've had some stability problems, not a lot, but a few. Updates seem to be the worst. That seems to be when the stability problems come up."
"The reporting aspect could be improved. While there are a lot of different options available, there are still pieces which are missing."
"The AT&T AlienVault USM is okay, but the relational database is not very good for large amounts of data. For example, many logs cannot be processed. It has been very slow for the queries and some data which are large, it is not very good in this case."
"It would be nice to see some machine learning and monitoring of the configuration in network devices."
"The other thing is the agent is OSSEC. They needed to create its own agent to help to find threats on the devices that it happens to be installed."
"Pay attention to false-positive event automatic correlations."
"The reporting and dashboards have room for improvement."
"I feel that some areas of improvement would be vulnerability scanning. We use a separate product that seems to do a much better job."
Earn 20 points
Quest InTrust is ranked 54th in Log Management while USM Anywhere is ranked 15th in Log Management with 113 reviews. Quest InTrust is rated 8.0, while USM Anywhere is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Quest InTrust writes "Technical support is knowledgeable and quick to respond". On the other hand, the top reviewer of USM Anywhere writes "Easy to use and affordable". Quest InTrust is most compared with Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and syslog-ng, whereas USM Anywhere is most compared with Wazuh, AlienVault OSSIM, IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
