We performed a comparison between Allot DDoS Secure and Arbor DDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, NETSCOUT, Akamai and others in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection."The product has good architecture, concepts, and diagrams to protect end customers. Machine learning, artificial intelligence, and pattern creation are its most valuable features. The tool's alerting systems protect critical infrastructure."
"The technical support of Arbor DDoS is good."
"The solution provides good protection against volumetric DDoS attacks."
"We are able to respond quickly and prevent DDoS attacks."
"Companies that live from their presence on the internet will get a very high return on investment from Arbor."
"Arbor has the ability to learn and self-create the appropriate profile for each customer."
"In the GUI, the packet capture is a very good option, as is the option to block an IP address."
"It provides packet capture and we can block or whitelist whichever IPs we need to. Whatever traffic we want to block - and we get IPs from internal teams and from national teams - we block at the Arbor level only, because if it gets to the firewall then firewall bandwidth will be taken."
"Analytics and its attack mitigation capabilities are valuable features of the solution."
"The tool's GUI and Java-based management platform needs improvement."
"The look and feel of the management console is a little old, excessively simple. If you compare it with other solutions, the look and feel of the console is like you're using technology from five or six years ago. It doesn't show all the technology that is actually behind it. It looks like an older solution, even though it is not."
"A small improvement could be a better reporting system."
"There should be an automatic way to configure it to monitor traffic and decide which is an attack and which is not. In Arbor, you need to tweak and set all parameters manually, whereas in Check Point DDoS Protector, you can select the lowest parameters, and over the weeks, Check Point DDoS Protector will learn the traffic and you can then tighten some of the parameters to decide which traffic is regular and which is malicious."
"Arbor Pravail APS devices do not sync features or config the backup enough. This needs to be improved."
"We need a SaaS model for the solution."
"An improvement would be to provide information on how pricing is done on different customer levels."
"With Arbor DDoS, its integration issues with other technologies or other vendors' technologies is an area of concern that could be improved."
"Because we had some routers that were somewhat old, they were not integrated with Arbor. They did not support the NetFlow version that Arbor was running. That was a challenge. We had to upgrade the routers. Some backward-compatibility would be helpful."
Allot DDoS Secure is ranked 25th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 1 review while Arbor DDoS is ranked 2nd in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 46 reviews. Allot DDoS Secure is rated 8.0, while Arbor DDoS is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Allot DDoS Secure writes "Protects critical infrastructure from alerts but GUI needs improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Arbor DDoS writes "A critical solution for security, as it includes features that can automatically detect and prevent DDoS attacks". Allot DDoS Secure is most compared with Radware DefensePro, whereas Arbor DDoS is most compared with Radware DefensePro, Cloudflare, Imperva DDoS, Corero and Fortinet FortiDDoS.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
