We performed a comparison between Alteryx and Darwin based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Microsoft, Alteryx and others in Data Science Platforms."The feature that I have found most valuable for Alteryx is its geo-referencing feature, it is very good. I use it a lot, especially for supply chain."
"Alteryx is a low-code platform, and that's the biggest reason why we chose it."
"Alteryx is so advanced. It's just drag and drop."
"The drag-and-drop features are useful for data scientists who do not like to code because it is already in the system."
"It allows for manipulation and automation, which has greatly reduced the amount of time required per project."
"The value add of Alteryx is the agility for making changes, and speed of deployment."
"Alteryx makes it easy for the end customer to see clean data in a structured form."
"I like the fact that you can easily blend data from different platforms."
"The solution helps with the automatic assessment of the quality of datasets, such as missing data points or incorrect data types."
"In terms of streamlining a lot of the low-level data science work, it does a few things there."
"The most valuable feature is the model-generation. With a nice dataset, Darwin gives you a nice model. That's a really nice feature because, if we're doing that ourselves, it's trial and error; we change the parameters a little and try again. We save time by just giving the dataset to Darwin and letting Darwin generate a model. We find the models it generates are good; better than we can generate."
"I liked the data checking feature where it looks at your data and sees how viable it is for use. That's a really cool feature. Automatic assessment of the quality of datasets, to me, seems very valuable."
"The thing that I find most valuable is the ability to clean the data."
"The key feature is the automated model-building. It has a good UI that will let people who aren't data scientists get in there and upload datasets and actually start building models, with very little training. They don't need to have any understanding of data science."
"I find it quite simple to use. Once you are trained on the model, you can use it anyway you want."
"Darwin has increased efficiency and productivity for our company. With our risk management team, there were models that took them more than three days to process each, only to see the outcome. Now, it takes minutes for Darwin to process the current model. So, we can have it in minutes. We don't have to wait three days for all the models to be tested, then make a decision."
"The price of the solution could improve by being lower."
"It would be great if Alteryx could take third party tools and incorporate them."
"I think better visualization would be helpful to this solution."
"When a process completes there is a notification, but the notification does not include the process's name."
"The gallery could improve in Alteryx. Additionally, if there was a Conditional Join feature it would be beneficial. Since I do not have this feature I have to use Python scripts."
"Alteryx is just as complicated as coding, in my opinion."
"A colleague of mind mentioned that the solution should have more options for the visualization of data."
"Deep learning models are not currently supported."
"The challenge is very big toward making models operational or to industrialize them. E.g., what we want to do is to make unique credit models for each customer. So, we are preparing the types of customers who we can try new credit models on Darwin. But, I see this still very challenging to be able to get the data sets so Darwin can work. At this point, we are working it to get the data sets ready for Darwin."
"There's always room for improvement in the UI and continuing to evolve it to do everything that the rest of AI can do."
"Our main data repository is on AWS. The trouble we are having is that we have to download the data from our repository to bring it into Darwin. It would be great if there was an API to connect our repository to Darwin."
"The analyze function takes a lot of time."
"Something they are working on, which is great, is to have an API that can access data directly from the source. Currently, we have to create a specific dataset for each model."
"There are issues around the ethics of artificial intelligence and machine learning. You need to have a lot of transparency regarding what is going on under the hood in order to trust it. Because so much is done under the hood of Darwin, it is hard to trust how it gets the answers it gets."
"An area where Darwin might be a little weak is its automatic assessment of the quality of datasets. The first results it produces in this area are good, but in our experience, we have found that extra analysis is needed to produce an extra-clean set of data."
"The Read Me's and the tutorials need to be greatly improved to get customers to understand how things work. It might be helpful to have some sample data sets for people to play around with, as well as some tutorial videos. It was very hard to find information on this in the time crunch that we had, to see how it worked and then make it work, while interfacing with folks at SparkCognition."
Earn 20 points
Alteryx is ranked 3rd in Data Science Platforms with 74 reviews while Darwin is ranked 27th in Data Science Platforms. Alteryx is rated 8.4, while Darwin is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Alteryx writes "Feature-rich ETL that condenses a number of functions into one tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Darwin writes "Empowers SMEs to build solutions and interface them with the existing business systems, products and workflows". Alteryx is most compared with KNIME, Databricks, Dataiku Data Science Studio, RapidMiner and Qlik Sense, whereas Darwin is most compared with IBM Watson Studio, Databricks and Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio.
See our list of best Data Science Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
