Compare Amazon AWS vs. QuickBase

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon AWS Logo
38,571 views|34,378 comparisons
QuickBase Logo
4,046 views|2,988 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon, Linode and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS). Updated: May 2021.
501,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"As a service vendor, we have helped clients to achieve faster "go to market" on their products, and have provided highly flexible cost-effective system management solutions.""The solution offers a low footprint. We don't have to come up with a data center ourselves. We basically don't have to own any hardware. We just rent a slice of their platform and we have everything we need.""The most valuable features are load balancers, databases, and S3 buckets.""The most valuable feature is that it is simple.""There are a lot of features that I really like including ease of deployment, ease of build and release, and also that it is heavily focused on a PaaS or SaaS model.""The experience with Amazon AWS is error-free. That was also, of course, something that I really appreciate. That means it's really well-tested and, as published or as declared.""The main feature that I like the most is the variety of solutions that it provides. It provides some analysis, business information and more. It provides a wide variety of services.""There is less work for the DBAs. Everything is handled in AWS itself."

More Amazon AWS Pros »

"This solution has provided for Rapid deployment of data collection tools, replacing spreadsheets with near real-time data.""QuickBase is an excellent product and it is very easy to get support."

More QuickBase Pros »

Cons
"This solution would be improved with the inclusion of hybrid Kubernetes management.""They should really consolidate and make things simpler rather than offer you hundreds of random options. The way everything is arranged really forces users to figure out everything on their own and then, on top of that, to calculate the total costs. There's an infinite number of combinations even just with cost calculations. It's just too much.""There are some limitations for certain applications that happen regionally and it is an issue for us.""They can launch the Oracle service in Azure, and we expect that this should be possible in Amazon AWS as well.""One of the problems that I have seen is that some of the products are not as mature as others.""I'm just bugged by the charges that I'm not really able to manage.""One area that could be improved is in data management. They could improve on the data side. For example, I see others with better cloud services and larger data computing capabilities.""We don't know whether to increase server capacity or alert notifications. We don't know which hard disc to purchase or what the next recommended CPU is. There should be an indicator. We would like to have more guidance."

More Amazon AWS Cons »

"The mobile app has improved, but it still needs work.""I would like to see the reporting enhanced because some of them are not easy to generate."

More QuickBase Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It's my understanding that our company is charged a few hundred dollars on a monthly basis.""I find that Amazon AWS is expensive.""The Oracle licensing is higher than it is with Amazon AWS.""I think they've done a pretty good job with their pricing.""Its price is kind of okay. When we do a migration from on-premises to the cloud, we typically use the lift-and-shift model. Based on the studies that we have done, cost savings are definitely there when we moved from on-premises to the cloud.""The price could be lower.""There are many variables involved in pricing service in AWS and overall the pricing is a bit on the higher side.""AWS is not an expensive product."

More Amazon AWS Pricing and Cost Advice »

"You have to negotiate the price because it varies based on the number of users you have, as well as how much cloud storage space you need."

More QuickBase Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
501,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It is flexible. It is quite comfortable to use for organizations.
Top Answer: It just needs to be improved from the security perspective.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
38,571
Comparisons
34,378
Reviews
53
Average Words per Review
450
Rating
8.4
Views
4,046
Comparisons
2,988
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
268
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
EC2, Amazon Web Services, AWS
Quick Base
Learn More
Overview

Amazon Web Services (AWS), is a collection of cloud computing services, also called web services, that make up a cloud-computing platform offered by Amazon.com. These services operate from 12 geographical regions across the world. The most central and well-known of these services arguably include Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud, also known as "EC2", and Amazon Simple Storage Service, also known as "S3". Amazon markets AWS as a service to provide large computing capacity more quickly and more cheaply than a client company building an actual physical server farm.

Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.

Offer
Learn more about Amazon AWS
Learn more about QuickBase
Sample Customers
Pinterest, General Electric, Pfizer, Netflix, and Nasdaq.
Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company30%
Financial Services Firm9%
Comms Service Provider9%
Manufacturing Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm8%
Media Company7%
REVIEWERS
Construction Company20%
Financial Services Firm18%
Logistics Company9%
Manufacturing Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Comms Service Provider15%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Manufacturing Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business47%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise38%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise73%
REVIEWERS
Small Business48%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise31%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon, Linode and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS). Updated: May 2021.
501,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 62 reviews while QuickBase is ranked 19th in Rapid Application Development Software with 2 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while QuickBase is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Helps us migrate clients to the cloud with ease, and allows us to provide a wide range of cloud services that live in AWS ecosystem and can interact with on-premises data centers". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QuickBase writes "Easy to use and the support is good". Amazon AWS is most compared with OpenShift, IBM Public Cloud, SAP Cloud Platform, Pivotal Cloud Foundry and Microsoft Azure, whereas QuickBase is most compared with Microsoft PowerApps, OutSystems, Zudy VINYL, Caspio and Microsoft Azure.

See our list of .

We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.