We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and SAP S4HANA on AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution is that they offer everything around in just one platform."
"I like the storage, all the codes like Lambda and Amazon EMR."
"They are enterprising and pretty good in terms of features. It has good security. Its availability is also pretty good. It is available everywhere in the world. It has pretty good integrations, and it is working well. They have done a lot of improvements, and its UI has improved a lot."
"There is no downtime. The solution is reliable."
"The product has a lot of new functionality."
"It's a very flexible and customizable service"
"The initial setup is not difficult and it did not take us more than one day."
"Easy to access and secure, two important features."
"This product is much better than most of the other products in this categaory as far as financial capabilities."
"They have their own instances where you can host your database."
"SAP S4HANA on AWS is an easy-to-use solution."
"The most valuable feature of SAP S4HANA is Fiori. It allows users to access information quickly and easily, without having to navigate through unnecessary screens or transactions. Additionally, the ability to retrieve data more efficiently is helpful. Furthermore, the pre-delivered videos and functionalities within the solution allow for easier application building."
"It's easy to use and user-friendly."
"The solution is scalable."
"The most valuable feature of SAP S4HANA on AWS is that when developed on a new structured system it can be configured."
"The most valuable feature of SAP S4HANA on AWS is the latency and speed. When we use the various typical relation database, the performance was visible."
"The price could be better."
"The response time of technical support could be better."
"I think Amazon could improve some of the security or fine-grained access for metadata and many other things."
"The interface is relatively complex."
"Support response times can be improved, especially in areas where faster assistance is crucial."
"We have had several issues with the products and services but as of now, there are no good alternatives."
"Configuration could be simplified."
"The pricing could be adjusted to provide more advantages versus current on-premise solutions for business applications."
"The platform's front-end user interface needs improvement compared to other applications."
"More availability zones will help customers choose AWS. I would like to see features that provide easier onboarding for ERP solutions like SAP. SAP has already partnered with S/4HANA on AWS for hosting its public cloud as well. More educational videos for customers to choose this cloud path would be great to have. That is, providing more documentation and marketing material would be better."
"The documentation isn't clear enough."
"The product can be very complex."
"Doesn't have a common development environment."
"The product could use more capabilities in the areas of robotics, machine learning and artificial intelligence, but these improvements are already on the way."
"This solution is very resource-intensive, including high memory and CPU utilization."
"CPU architecture is an area where the solution currently has some issues. Improvement in CPU architecture could improve the performance side and the adherence to the parameters set by SAP."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 250 reviews while SAP S4HANA on AWS is ranked 7th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 35 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while SAP S4HANA on AWS is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S4HANA on AWS writes "With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, OpenShift, Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas SAP S4HANA on AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Alibaba Cloud. See our Amazon AWS vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
